|
Conservatives are fond of saying the theoretically-unbiased media are actually biased leftwards. Liberals often respond with the opposite charge. Here's a liberal who makes a case that Hollywood looooves liberalism, and cites 20 or more academy award-winning films to prove his point. But what's so interesting is the apparent naivete with which their content is accepted; no difficult nuances are encountered... I'd love to introduce the list, but I think the author does it very well for me: "Instead of hurling back insults (which I could easily do), I instead feel a need to redefine for these pinheads (sorry, had to get in one there) exactly what it is to be a liberal and/or a Democrat, and why most of us detest the policies and political thoughts of Republicans and conservatives, and why I believe, liberalism is the only true political philosophy which is truly the most American, and the most true to what we are as human beings." (Uh, yeah, glad you're not going to be insulting. Anyway...) "Now I could write pages and pages on what I feel liberalism is, and I in fact, may do so very soon if these attacks keep up. But to keep this column dedicated to what we discuss, Academy Awards and great films, I shall define for you why I am a liberal and why I feel so passionate about the liberal philosophy through what I love best, the movies. Below, I shall discuss briefly groups of films that I feel contain the best ideas of why I am a liberal, and why liberalism is the truest American and human philosophy." (Great, now, on with the reviews! ...)
Brilliant, indeed. In the follow-up discussion an apolitical observer (moral relativist, concerned for her kid's viewing habits) tries to point out that 'lumping people together' is generally a bad move. He praises her faintly, calling her a "conservative": "Typically, most conservatives never even want to have their views challenged, where liberals on the other hand usually always like to hear the other side. I know that I enjoy having my views challenged, and I listen to all points of view. The majority of the time however, you will never hear a conservative say that they can see the other side." The beauty of media bias is that it isn't confined just to journalism, but is throughout the media - including movies, books, and magazines. The complaints about hardcore partisans (they hurl insults, don't want their views challanged, etc.) pretty much apply to hardcore partisans of every political stripe. And usually it's the hardcore partisans who complain the most about "the other guy". Posted by: Kevin Murphy on January 24, 2003 10:23 AM harry: Regarding the reflex to call those not 100% liberal "conservatives" -- I think I'm observing that too. For example, Fox News is often bashed as "conservative", yet they have quite a number of partisan liberal commentators. Same with O'Reilly, who is all over the board on issues, often labelled as a "conservative" by liberals. Perhaps there's some symmetric behavior by conservatives, but I'm not encountering it currently. Kevin: I have no doubt there are hardcore partisans of every stripe. Currently, I'm trying to understand both sides of this media bias discussion (why I keep running into this kind of material), but I'm either seeing a lot more wacky liberalism, or its the case that I'm so unconsciously conservatively biased that I just can't see the corresponding hardcore-ness in conservative allegations of bias. I guess if I wanted correspondingly hardcore "conservatives", I could tune into the "Rush Limbaugh" show, but I'm wandering the 'net and blogosphere, not the AM dial... Posted by: tim on January 24, 2003 12:00 PM Kevin, I think the problem that what you say is almost circular, in the sense that a hardcore partisan would be defined as someone who doesn't want their view challenged. So, to me, the question is whether any of the various political stripes is characterized more largely as "hardcore partisans." Posted by: harry on January 24, 2003 02:14 PM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
It's scary the way that some people equate celebrity with intelligence and authority. What's scarier is that someone would take fictional movies and use them as proof of facts. It seems pretty distant from reality for a person to point to how something -- anything -- is portrayed in a movie and accept that as *proof* of what that is (was) really like. It's a movie. It's someone's personal take on something.
This person is proud to be a liberal based on how they are portrayed in movies! In movies! I had no idea that movies could be counted on for such realism! I DEFINITELY want to be and old west cowboy now! No wait -- I'm going to jump through a plate glass window! It won't hurt -- it doesn't in *movies*. What naivete, a hallmark of liberalism.
The last comment about conservatives not wanting their views challenged is most heinous. For the most part, anyone not completely towing the liberal checklist 100% is called a conservative. Please.
Posted by: harry on January 24, 2003 07:25 AM