Current Features

Gouverneur Morris
America: A Christian Nation?
Ya Gotta Have Faith!
Not-Hearing: Two Examples
The Paradox of Public Advertising
Cleave; Sanction
Doomsday Clock: False Authority Fallacy
Politicians and Their Children
Eric Boehlert Knows Inner Motives!
What is the Purpose of Democracy?
One Mess Created, Time to Create Another
Christians Pursuing Happiness

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Insignificant Thoughts
Insomnomaniac
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
The Right Scale
Sinking in Quixand


St. Louis Grocery Store Strike: Schnucks, Dierbergs, Shop 'n Save Insult Intelligence, Attempt Dirty Tricks, Ruin Public Image on Random Observations

Those of who you read my previous post on the St. Louis grocery strike know that I'm not fawningly sympathetic to the union position.

But neither am I a patsy for the grocery chains. And when one of their representatives attempts to post misleading comments, I think it's worth exposing that too...

Minutes ago, someone with a high-speed cable modem connection in St. Louis posted a comment porporting to be from a father who, with his son, is now just blissfully happy to get the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to work at Schnucks for $9 an hour!

Of course, why they need regular employment so urgently and desparately, if they can already enjoy Charter digital cable plus a dedicated Internet connection (a luxury easily worth about $1200 per year), is one truly amazing mystery!

To whit:

I have not had a regular job for many months, and my son has not had any full-time job since he finished high school over a year ago. So we both are happy as larks that we have a wonderful employer at last!

Yeah, right: temporary labor at a grocery store making one "happy as larks" (omigosh, is this guy for real?) with their "wonderful new employer". "At last!"??? Oh please!

But wait: It's not paradise after all! Their evil, cruel employer isn't giving them any health insurance at all! What if Tiny Tim needs an operation? Cruel Dierbergs, Schnucks, and Shop 'n Save put out for their union employees, but they're apparently treating the current "scab" laborers like dirt!:

I have NO health insurance at all.

The faker who posted it strains credibility even further when he recommends union members donate 50% of their already-paltry salaries to charity, buffoonishly:

Where is the unions' concern for their fellow man...? Why not work 20 hours a week and give the other 20 hours to some unemployed folks, sharing all that pay with someone who has none?

Yeah, "all that pay", right: Right after you do. :-) Please, don't make us all hurt outselves laughing! I thought you were someone who just got a job... why are you suddenly moralizing against "the union"?

Sure, a lot of people pulling in $400 per week, pre-tax, have half left to donate to others. (Why don't you just cancel your cable service, use a regular dial-up connection, and donate that to the poor, Mr. Caring Grocery Store Management Faker?)

And of course this poster uses perfect grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, while quoting current employment statistics and striker compensation levels! Sure, there's a lot people with that level of ability and knowledge who are going to be "happy as larks" bagging groceries. Uh-huh.

With people like you out trying to "help" the grocery stores look good, the unions don't even have to walk the picket line to make their management look bad -- you do it quite well for them!

Hmmmm... maybe I should recommend people avoid shopping at Schnucks, Dierbergs, and Shop 'N Save? I'm sure some will draw that conclusion after reading this posting. Perhaps I'll start working to make sure others support the union in their efforts and avoid the stores right now...


Congratulations. I'm going to moralize at you. This seldom happens, and I apologize to the others who have to watch it. It's not pretty, but I think this is important...

Fake poster: What you are experiencing right now is called "blowback". It's what sometimes happens when you try to promote the "justice" of your cause through deception.

If you think a comment in my little pathetic blog could help you, a front-page expose of your deception will hurt you many times more. Which is to say, hardly at all -- nobody reads this silly thing.

But there's something much more important at stake here...

At this point you are presented with a choice. You've got to decide: What you did was wrong because (A) you didn't do it well enough and got caught, or (B) because it is inherantly wrong to try to use "evil" means, such as false testimony, to produce a "good" end.

I'm hoping you'll decide (B) and knock it off.

Obviously, I'm one of those pliestocine throwbacks who think we will have to give an accounting to God. And, in case you think I'm moralizing, I have a few doozies to account for myself. But I'm serious, friend: Look in the mirror. You obviously have kids. Do you really want to be the kind of guy who lied at strategic points in his career to make a few extra bucks?

How do you think you and others would feel if I could track you down (I have your IP address and connection point) and publicly exposed what you did? (I won't.) Would you be proud or ashamed?

And if you start here, doing this, where does it end?

Remember, we all gotta go someday. You're gonna be 82 and working to gasp that last breath. And what's this gonna mean to you then?

Think about it, friend.

You're certainly forgiven. By me, anyway. Just change, okay?

Comments

hello Im one of those union workers you like to talk about so much. You will have to excuse my spelling and my writing I dont have any one doing spell checks on my writing. That was just a little dig see im writing this in the ten min. before I have to leave for my job. See im one of the workers who hasnt went on strike yet because our contract isnt up yet. But it will be soon and I just wanted to let you know a few things about these people on strike that you dont seem to know or care about. First we are all not teenage baggers I have worked for this company for 9 years. and plan to work for quite awile longer and the people I work with are not trying to get something for nothing. We have people just trying to make a living at all of these stores.You made a point of telling our wages and health and how your health benifits werent as good but i noticed you didnt tell your wages. I have a lot more to say and I probaby will when I get home if im not to tired you see I have to spend the next 8 hours on my feet waiting talking to a lot of people. Unlike you who get to sit at a desk and judge me and all of my coworkers.

Posted by: on October 20, 2003 08:34 AM

hello i am not a union worker and i am not an employee of the grocery stores on strike i am a consumer i shop at albertson's which i have to say that i have not once yet crossed the picket line without me neither the union nor the grocery stores would have a job i came across the web site one night to really see what was going on with the grocery store strike it seems to me that one of the biggest issues about the strike is health benifits first i want to say that almost everyone else in the world pays for their health benifits why can't you i also read one of the comments saying that the people that were putting in their two sense were not being specific about their jobs their benifits also their wages and made it seem like that they had no right to make a complaint so i am i make $11.50/hour and i am non-union-worker and through my work unless you are upper management you don't even get a chance to apply for health benifits so what i had to do was get private insurance believe me it was allot more expensive (so why are you complaning?) and allot more trouble along with a monthly payement that i have to come up with every month in my opinion the price of living is definetly up and still going up paying for your health benifits is essential and a part of life now a days you need it and i think the strike should end and no matter how wrong or right you think the union is or how wrong or wright the grocery stores employees are being you work for the union therefore they are your higher authority your boss if you don't like it QUIT!

Posted by: on February 11, 2004 01:39 AM

Regarding the February 11th posting: Most of us would prefer NOT to pay for our health insurance because our compensation, aside from a paycheck, is so sparse to begin with. Becoming a full-time-status employee with a guaranteed 40-hours-per-week work schedule is nearly impossible these days. Dierbergs in particular prefers to hire a slew of courtesy clerks and give them MINIMAL hours each week, rather than give 25+ hours to the loyal clerks they have had on payroll for years. The longer you stay with one of these companies, and the farther up you move, the more settling discoveries you make about how they work. And yes, most companies in this world operate in a most shameful manner, but it's much more difficult to tolerate when you make so little money. MANY of these grocery workers truly do NOT have many other employment choices, since many do not possess any education beyond the secondary level (high school). The Big 3 get the worth of the employees out of them each day, and even in the case of Dierbergs, whose expenses (not prices, but expenses) are greater than the other 2, the cost of paying for employee health insurance is, dare I say, COMPLETELY NEGLIGIBLE. All the boo-hooing from the Big 3 over health insurance expenses is little more than CROCODILE TEARS. So for everyone out there who says, "Everybody else pays for their insurance, so you should too," please keep in mind two things. First, you probably don't know much about these employees' circumstances. And second, most "everybody else" gets paid more, or at least has the opportunity to accrue substantial wage increases over the LONG years of their employment. (There's so much more to this than what the public reads in a newspaper, or pretends to know through some allegedly parallel life-circumstance.)

Posted by: TheBerg on February 8, 2005 09:00 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Filthy Rich Republicans! | Front Page | Page Two | Paul Manufactured the Christian Jesus! »