Current Features

Edward Feser Hates Intelligent Design, Part 2
Why Couldn't There Have Been Nothing?
Bashing Berlinski with Whale Evolution
A Very Bad Christian Argument Against Naturalism
Dialog with an OWS "Green" Advocate
"Madness"
Name that Party: Jon Corzine
The World According to Steve Benen
"In Time": A "Progressive" Take on Longevity
Lisa Randall Lampoons Rick Perry
Feser on Scientism
"The Evil God Challenge"

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Bumper Stickers
Church of the Left Wing
Computers and Technology
Conservativism 101
Conspiracy Theories
Crime and Punishment
Dictatorships
Economics
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Genocide
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Honduras
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Libertarians
Life Skills
Media Bias
National Defense
Obama
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Reality-Based News
Ron Paul
Sarah Palin
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
The War on Childhood
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

Bookworm Room
Beyond the Rim
Dissecting Leftism
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
La Shawn Barber
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Zappe Family Blog


Chick-Fil-A Rocks

When I was much, much younger, I attended a Christian conference called "Marketplace" in the Chicago Hilton Towers, along Michigan Avenue. You may have seen this place -- it's the gold-encrusted hotel featured at the end of "The Fugitive". You know that roof chase scene at the end? I've been out on that roof a number of times.

But, as usual, I digress...

I saw fliers for a business called "Chick-Fil-A", looking for people interested in getting involved -- I think it was looking for franchisees. Never heard of the place, but it was clear they were trying to look serious about ethics from their blurb.

Now I know what all that was about. Chick-Fil-A has great chicken sandwiches. And a funny logo. And they give the workers one day off a week. Always. Radical.

I'm not the only admirer:

For a big-time corporate type, Dan Cathy doesn't put on any airs. He goes to 40 or 50 of these openings a year. And there he was out in the cold at 6:30 a.m.

Cathy gave the crowd a message that you don't often hear from a business tycoon. And, without prompting, he repeated it to me later in the warm light of day.

"We're here to glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us and to have a positive influence on all who come in contact with Chick-fil-A," he said, quoting the company's mission statement.

Sitting in a booth in the new store, Cathy pointed to a black-and-white photo on the wall. It shows him and his brother at the opening of one of their father's early restaurants nearly 40 years ago. His father, Truett Cathy, had led a prayer right before it was snapped.

On Monday night, during final preparations, the staff at the new Hernando store said a prayer, too.

"We've not changed our story," Cathy said. And then he quoted a biblical proverb by chapter and verse: "In all your ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct your paths."

One way that Chick-fil-A acknowledges God is by closing its doors on Sundays so workers can go to church or just stay home with their families and rest. It sponsors foster homes. Its kids' meals typically include character-building books. And Chick-fil-A is hugely profitable.

Again, Cathy says, "God has blessed this business."

John R. Mitten, the local owner-operator of the store, has similar convictions. He says the company doesn't require its employees to be Christians - that would be illegal. But it seeks honesty, integrity and a servant's heart from each applicant, he said.

"We look for characteristics and qualifications that are most typically found in believers," he said.

Chick-fil-A's arrival in Hernando County will satisfy our longing for chicken sandwiches, waffle fries and fresh-squeezed lemonade. But it is clear Chick-fil-A wants its influence to be felt far beyond the walls of its dining room.

Who says you have to choose between true profits (of a non-superficial kind) and making the world a better place?

Comments

Sean,

Your various statements are contradictory. You say a company can ground itself in a set of values -- but then it can't choose to associate more with those whose lives reflect those values, or support causes that do? What does it mean to 'support' a set of values while not 'supporting' them -- lip service?

...it seeks honesty, integrity and a servant's heart from each applicant, he said.

Then you claim they should be hiring all kinds of people. Yet they just stated they do hire all kinds of people.

You call companies "our companies." "Our?" Those companies aren't "our" companies. We're not yet (thank heavens) a socialist nation, where we "own" every single business out there. Believe it or not, people still get to "own" their own businesses! They can still support whatever charities or political parties they want.

What you call "flirtiing with danger" is what our country is founded on -- freedom of political and religious expression, even if you own a business (as most the founding fathers did).

But if you believe each business owner should be told exactly who to hire, and what values ("honesty, integrity and a servant's heart") he or she may or may not be allowed to use as a criteria for promotion, then you have basicly taken away the basic freedom someone has to do what they want with their own business, and to make it reflect their own core values.

Which, I suppose for some, is the entire point.


I fear for, and fear, this generation. The education they received has left them so morally and politically stupid that they think the basic principles our country was founded on -- for the past two hundred-plus years -- are a scary, creeping form of totalitarianism -- and they thinking taking away those freedoms would be a really, really good move!

"Why, we can't let a business owner support the Republican party, or give to pro-life causes! That's dangerous."


And I can't help but notice that in every case -- and Sean is just one example among so many -- that a viceral dislike of Christians or Judeo-Christian values is a strong motivator for those kinds of demands for loss of liberty and decision-making ability.

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on August 26, 2006 11:44 AM

Thought I'd post this on the apparently litigious nature of Chick-Fil-A source.

You are no longer allowed to suggest that people "eat more x" it seems.

Posted by: Ryan W. on December 5, 2011 01:42 AM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Philosophy and the Filmmakers Behind "Lord of the Rings" | Front Page | Page Two | Tim Robbins' Play "Embedded": A Separate Reality »