|
When I was much, much younger, I attended a Christian conference called "Marketplace" in the Chicago Hilton Towers, along Michigan Avenue. You may have seen this place -- it's the gold-encrusted hotel featured at the end of "The Fugitive". You know that roof chase scene at the end? I've been out on that roof a number of times. But, as usual, I digress... I saw fliers for a business called "Chick-Fil-A", looking for people interested in getting involved -- I think it was looking for franchisees. Never heard of the place, but it was clear they were trying to look serious about ethics from their blurb. Now I know what all that was about. Chick-Fil-A has great chicken sandwiches. And a funny logo. And they give the workers one day off a week. Always. Radical. I'm not the only admirer:
Who says you have to choose between true profits (of a non-superficial kind) and making the world a better place? Sean, Your various statements are contradictory. You say a company can ground itself in a set of values -- but then it can't choose to associate more with those whose lives reflect those values, or support causes that do? What does it mean to 'support' a set of values while not 'supporting' them -- lip service?
Then you claim they should be hiring all kinds of people. Yet they just stated they do hire all kinds of people. You call companies "our companies." "Our?" Those companies aren't "our" companies. We're not yet (thank heavens) a socialist nation, where we "own" every single business out there. Believe it or not, people still get to "own" their own businesses! They can still support whatever charities or political parties they want. What you call "flirtiing with danger" is what our country is founded on -- freedom of political and religious expression, even if you own a business (as most the founding fathers did). But if you believe each business owner should be told exactly who to hire, and what values ("honesty, integrity and a servant's heart") he or she may or may not be allowed to use as a criteria for promotion, then you have basicly taken away the basic freedom someone has to do what they want with their own business, and to make it reflect their own core values. Which, I suppose for some, is the entire point.
"Why, we can't let a business owner support the Republican party, or give to pro-life causes! That's dangerous."
Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on August 26, 2006 11:44 AM Diverse gay loving, abortion having, elitist are going to rule the world with a Chick-Fil-A sandwich and 2 waffle fries in their hands. They are so tasty.. O yea, and some Polynesian sauce too.. Posted by: Lee on September 14, 2010 03:53 PM Thought I'd post this on the apparently litigious nature of Chick-Fil-A source. You are no longer allowed to suggest that people "eat more x" it seems. Posted by: Ryan W. on December 5, 2011 01:42 AM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
While I agree that Chick-Fil-A is entitled to ground itself on values from Christianity, I think that their anti-abortion stance is wrong. We are flirting with danger if our companies begin aligning themselves to one religion or political party - how about inclusion for all? Man/women/christian/buddhist/gay/straight/pro-abortion/anti-abortion?
Posted by: Sean on August 16, 2005 09:01 AM