Current Features

Dr. Conyers, I Presume?
Ban the "Knife Culture"?
All the News That's Fit to Hide
Cho Seung Hui: Dishing it out to the "Rich and Privileged"
Bring the Troops Home!
How to Survive
Notes from Today (Updated)
Thoughts on Christians and Race
Mismanaging the Iraq War
"It's all about me... just give me something."
Two Stories on Conversions
Obama's Church: "Conservatives are saying..."

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Insignificant Thoughts
Insomnomaniac
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
The Right Scale
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Quixtar: A Business Opportunity for You!

A while ago I took a friend up on an offer to learn a bit more about Quixtar. I'm glad I did, as it's provided me with a what I would normally consider a fascinating glimpse into the world of Amway/Quixar. I say "normally" because it becomes clear from a few of the "exit testimonials" that I see that real people and real lives are at stake here, and, in some cases, real people are being hurt.

But then again, that's what the business model predicts.

So anyway, for your reading entertainment, here's a Fisking of a prototypical argument as to why you should join Quixtar, which was just posted here. If you read it closely, it's fairly informative...


All you negative people make me laugh!!!

We have people posting that they've been deceived in various ways, and this guy's main reaction is to laugh? Yes indeed, condecension is a great sales technique.

DO you relized that you work for a living? Do you relaize that you work for SOMEBODY?

No, I'm sure most people who have a 9-5 job never noticed they worked for anybody. I'm sure it never crossed their minds.

The intent here is to make the reader or listener resentful. The goal with these kinds of arguments is to make them angry that someone else is making more money than they are, to trigger envy. To make the person unhappy (not thankful) for what they have, and make them start to violate the commandment that one should not covet what other people have.

Do you realize you will not make more than your boss in the "position" you are at? Will your boss ever make mmore than his boss? Will anyone make more than the owner, president, or CEO of the company YOU WORK for as an emplyoee? I didn't think so.

We can't be happy unless we make more than someone else does? Bad kind of thinking! In truth, you can do quite well by making others do even better -- real business is often a win-win position.

Second, what do you care if your boss makes more? The real question to consider is: Are you being paid fairly for what you do? If not, work to get a different job or position. Don't wander around miserable because someone makes better money than you.

Lastly, such allegations are factually inaccurate. At many points, I have made more than my "boss".

Let me ask you this, why does a muti-billionaire like Robert Kiyosaki whom wrote New Yorks best selling book "Rich Dad Poor Dad" talk nothing but great things about Quixtar, Amway, Etc.

Another piece of stunning logic: If Robert Kiyosaki likes something it must be good! And he must like it because it's good for you -- he would never have a selfish motive!

In real life, Kiyosaki doesn't appear to be anywhere near as rich as he claims, and he's been exposed as a fraud on this site and others.

The reason he does, is because he like that we are being shown how to become business owners, not sales peolpe.

Actually, Quixtar is nothing like owning a real business: In a real business you make your money from this little external entity called the customer. In Quixtar, most the money comes from inside. That should be a huge tip-off to you that something's not right.

You will never get ahead in the E-Quadrant which is the emplyees status, or the S-Quad which is the sel-employeed people.

First, the author ("John") accuses everyone outside of Quixtar of being "negative". Then he tells everyone outside Quixtar that that they will "never get ahead" being an employee or self-employeed.

And who is being negative here?

And apparently he is using some rather novel meaning of "get ahead" because it clearly doesn't refer to making money:

They make a lot of money...

Yes, what failures they are without Quixtar...

but thier time belongs to someone else, and their is no gurantee that you have a job or brick and mortar business the very next day.

Everyone who serves a need has some portion of their time "belong to someone else." So what? At least they are making money. Look into the average probability of making serious cash in Quixtar, and you'll see what I mean. There may be "no guarantee" of success in real life, but ask yourself if Quixtar gives you a guarantee, either. In fact, you'll probably find the odds are startlingly low.

Last, if you want some different kind of business than a 9-5 job, there are a host of opportunities out there for you. Don't just jump into Quixtar because they are the first person you hear telling you to hate the 9-5 routine.

I wish these thumb-sucking negative weenies would get out of their pitty party and do something in life to help themselves and families instead of sucking the life out of positive go-getters that want the best for their families, and other families with this great opportunity from Quixtar.

Now we move into the personal insults and ad homen arguments: Everyone who disagrees with me, or has any words of caution about Quixtar must be a "thumb-sucking" loser!

The line of argument carefully attempts to create a false dichotomy: Quixtar people = WINNERS, anyone else, especially people who might have even a single critical word for Quixtar = LOSERS.

Of course the alleged "loser" category is filled with people like Bill Gates (software), Warren Buffett (investing), Trump (real estate), Bloomberg (financial news), Mother Theresa (charitable acts), Colin Powell (military), John McCain (politician)...

There can be no "winners" in the non-Quixtar category. That would be entirely too unsettling for this guy's worldview.

Negative people are the bucket of crabs analogy. Have you ever seen a bucket of crabs that are miserable in eachothers company because they are confined, restricted, limited, have no FREEDOM? Then one day 1-crab out of 20 or 40 crabs looks up and sees opportunity when he sees the sky and the light, where there are no limits, the crab heads way for the top of th bucket and just as the crab reaches the top and sees and smells freedom...the crabs below reach up and grabs the crab that wants better than the ugly situation its in down there and pulls him right back into the misery.

How explain all the people who have negative things to say about Quixtar? One explanation might be that they've looked into it and/or actually done it and found out it's not all it claims to be.

Of course, that can't possibly be true! The real explanation MUST be that everyone in the whole world is so terribly threatened by the success of would-be Quixtar people that, in their insane jealousy that someone just might get ahead, they will do just about anything to prevent them from being successful.

Really.

He really, honestly means it.

Of course, this doesn't explain why there aren't people just dying of envy and working to prevent people from becoming doctors, lawyers, dentists (those anti-dentites!), plumbers, anesthesiologists, real-estate investors, opthamologists, contractors, veteranarians, stock brokers, or a host of other high-paying professions.

Again, note that in the mind of this person, or at least the mindset he wants to put you into, almost all behavior is primarily motivated by "envy". You must be discontent because someone makes more than you. All other people want to see you fail for the same reason.

What an amazingly egotistical worldview to inclucate a person with.

I don't even know half the people who post here. Why on earth should I want them to fail? If some of them like or appreciate me, it works out much better for me if they become rich.

Anyone who is reading this, put yourself in that crabs position, do you want life to pass you by and take you down, when you want to live life to its fullest for the better of yourself and your family ? Are you Man or woman enough to do what ever it takes to give your family and yourself your freedom?

No: Are you man or woman enough to think for yourself and not listen to bogus arguments which try to make you jealous, envious, distrustful of your friends or family (should they caution you against Quixtar), and tell you that you must be a loser unless you do exactly what this guy is telling you to?

All this doesn't prove Quixtar is a bad business opportunity, but think about it: If this is the best kind of argument they can produce, what does that tell you?

I'd rather see their balance sheet, and an open statement of where the money is going, with proven, audited records which demonstrate that the average participant previously made, not lost, money.

Most businesses, most jobs, and most investements give you that, you know.

Be very suspicious of a group that won't show you that.

It means they have something to hide.

Comments

Well...it's people like you who do NOT LISTEN and make what ever you want out of the situation. You apparently need to re-read what I have written, and change your assumptions to logical thinking if you can. "Quixtar" has no bearing on everything I said, I don't care if you shovel scum out of the gutters of the streets. The facts remain the same. I admire and respect the people that you wrote as follows: Of course the alleged "loser" category is filled with people like Bill Gates (software), Warren Buffett (investing), Trump (real estate), Bloomberg (financial news), Mother Theresa (charitable acts), Colin Powell (military).

Infact, they are strong leaders, and believe in what they are doing and don't let anyone like you steal their dream! Bill gates and Donald Trump, were laughed at when they saw their visions and dreams. Do you thingk they would be where they are at today if negative followers as yourself keep them down? Quixtar is one vehicle to finanial freedom and helping others. I dare you do quote me where I said there was nothing else outside of Quixtar. But, its ok to be wrong, don't worry about it, I forgive you. Because you don't know what you don't know.If you get out of your negative world Mr./Ms. Manipulator, you would understand what I wrote.

I would love to take the time to respond to everything else you were so excited and anxtious to quote and comment everything I wtote about. But if you can't read something without twisting it all around to have your followers agree with you and put you on a pedistal, than I can't wate my time on speaking logically with you. Why don't you watch the movie BRAVEHEART, I think you will lean alot about integrity, loyalty, wisdom, and what it is like to stand up for what you believe in, because if you don't than you may as well kiss your self goodby and call yourself someones slave. Well, as they say..."you can lead a hore to water, but you can't make him drink". I have to get ready to meet and show my 16th plan this month to an awesoem couple whom is very excited and asked me to meet with them to show them this awesome opportunity. Infact, I will contact and show 2-more by the end of friday for you. SO have great day! Oh and remember to "buckle-up and don't drink and drive" An that has nothing to do with Quixtar, I know you would love to falisfy a quote out of that saying that Quixtar said that!

Posted by: John on April 15, 2004 05:38 PM

"Quixtar" has no bearing on everything I said...

Oh. Sorry then. Somehow, I got the impression you were writing about Quixtar. My mistake.


I think you will lean alot about integrity, loyalty, wisdom, and what it is like to stand up for what you believe in...

Yes, I clearly have difficulty standing up for and speaking out about things I believe in... ;-)


because if you don't than you may as well kiss your self goodby and call yourself someones slave.

John, everybody is a slave to something or somebody else. The question is merely who or what you are enslaved to. The only way to stop being a slave to sin, evil is to be a slave to righteousness.

So what are you a slave to?


If you get out of your negative world Mr./Ms. Manipulator, you would understand what I wrote.

That would be a "Mister". :-)

Let's make a quick comparison: I do this for free, have my own business elsewhere, don't take a penny in support for this site, don't try to make people feel envious, guilty or scared, and I'm a manipulator.

You're selling a product, are you not? You're selling the Quixtar plan, are you not? You're in a position to make more money if many people think well of Quixtar, aren't you?

Who has something to gain here? Who's more likely to be saying something so they can make more $$$?

I'm more than happy to let the reader decide that for themselves.


I have to get ready to meet and show my 16th plan this month to an awesoem couple whom is very excited...

So will you make sure they know everything they'll need to know to make a fully informed decision? The positives and the negatives?

For example, will you tell them the total expected costs to stay "core"? (In my organization, it was about $5,000-$9,000 per year.) Will you tell them that there are far fewer millionaires, on average, in Quixtar than among the general population? Will you tell them "Quixtar" used to be known as "Amway"? Will you tell them, honestly, how much time you really put into doing this, or are you going to tell them it's 6-8 hours per week as so many do?

If you won't tell them these things -- so that they can make a decision based on all the available data, not just the stuff you want them to know -- then how can you tell yourself you're acting in their best interest rather your own?

Think of this as you talk to them.


When you give your presentation, will you give them arguments which are designed to make them feel things like envy, jealousy towards their boss, and fear -- like the ones you gave here -- when the bible clearly portrays these things as being against God's will?

Think of these things as you give your presentation to them.


Hey, don't worry about me. I'm just a guy with a blog. I've got no power over you other than the ability to write back when you say stuff.

But I know of something much better than Quixtar, which is available to you if you're interested in it. It can change your life waaaaay beyond what you could ever hope from Quixtar. Feel free to ask if you're interested in learning more.

God bless you, friend.

- Tim

Posted by: Tim on April 15, 2004 09:36 PM

Just a nit-pick, but my skin crawls when people use "whom" incorrectly in order to sound as though they are meticulous about grammar.

One more:
What is with the Braveheart analogy? Good movie, but I prefer my models of "integrity, loyalty, wisdom" to be people I know.

Final note:
Good writing, Tim. Your post is proof that the internet is drawing back the curtains on how AmQuix organizations really work.

Posted by: Brendan on April 16, 2004 11:10 AM

Excellent analysis Tim.

As for John, it might be wise to let go of your apprehension and consider what Tim is talking about. Tim is being very logical and indeed has expressed an opinion that couldn't be further from truth. It is clear to me that he is more concerned with the system rather than with a personality dispute.

It is generally true that the United States has the hardest working workforce in the industrialized world. We work harder than any other country. That even includes Japan. The motive, for most of us, is just to earn a living. But for others it is also their way of being able to make a contribution to others, while at the same time being rewarded for their contribution.

There are more benefits to having a career than one might think. And, yes, it is hard work. But, as Tim pointed out, we are all slaves to our own mortality. In order to survive, we need to make the ground beneath the crops fertile and we need to go out and hunt for our steak.

Of course, mankind has attempted to simplify the process with systems, inventions and bureaucracies, and instead complicated our civilization with endless entropy. So as one of the results of this entropy, a lot of us are working for some CEO at some company. But some of us are also curing the sick, inspiring others with their talents, engineering roads for us to travel, risking their lives in the name of national defense, serving others meals, and so on, and so on.

Were everyone in the world involved with Quixtar, who would actually do the growing of the crops? Who is going to chop our steaks and distribute them to all people? Who will find medicines to heal the dying? Who will educate our young? Who will bring others to justice? Who will serve us hamburgers? Who will build our houses? Who will maintain our phone lines? Who will be able to give us gasoline?

Like any other system in mankind's fruitless attempt to free ourselves from our own mortality, Quixtar's MLM model is an attempt at making a system do all the work. Yet, for all the systems we have come up with, everyone forgets that we still depend on the crops grown out of the ground in order to survive.

Despite the many injustices in this world, work is still not just a reward, but it is a contribution to society. Quixtar, on the other hand, is an embracing of greed, and the contribution goes only to teaching others to look for the reward and neglect all other things. Not only is Quixtar not for everyone, but it is corrupt in its motives. And if we pretended that it was ethical, the entire world would ultimately self-destruct under its own selfishness.

Posted by: A. C. Lee on April 16, 2004 03:22 PM

I am posting in response to the fascinating dialogue between Tim and John.


John you absolutely amaze me. I have enjoyed reading your post. I truly have. Tim you are excellent as well.


You both are very strong in your convictions; whether or not you see the other's point of view - which you might but that was not discussed deeply in the post - you are each holding to your particular stance.


I would like to add some commentary relating to your post John. I believe it may be beneficial to think over some things carefully. I'm not saying you must, only that it might be to your benefit John.


When I quote your posting John, I will enclose the reference in brackets such as this: >>text I'm quoting


1 - You stated in your post the following:
>>Well...it's people like you who do NOT LISTEN and make what ever you want out of the situation. You apparently need to re-read what I have written, and change your assumptions to logical thinking if you can.


I will key on the words you used:
>>...change your assumptions to logical thinking...


What makes you believe that Tim was making assumptions and was not using logical thinking? I mean what proof, other than disagreement with opinions, do you have that he was not being logical? He may very well have been using logic that springs from a differing basis than to which you subscribe. Does differing on an opinion mean that someone is being illogical?


2 - I am now looking at the phrasing you employed in this particular section:
>>I don't care if you shovel scum out of the gutters of the streets. The facts remain the same.


I cannot help but wonder why you used that particular phrase:
>>shovel scum out of the gutters


I have approximately 10+ years of time involved with Amway & its newer sister corporation Quixtar. I have hundreds and hundreds of tapes/CDs from the AQMO (Amway Quixtar Motivational Organization) System I belong to, and I have been to the major and not so major functions. I have heard Crowns and Crown Ambassadors speak in public and in private settings. This is just so you know that I am not spouting from a lack of solid information.


That all being said, I would like to ask you why you used that particular phrasing? Is it a particular phrase you have always used, or could it be that you picked it up from the motivational tapes or from a speaker or maybe even from your upline? I am just curious.


Phrases like that seem to come from the AQMO organization speakers and its participants. I find that people who are an active part of these systems tend to use the phrases like this and 'parrot' what they hear. Maybe you are not doing this, but I am cannot help but question your reasons.


3 - You stated that these strong leaders didn’t: >>let anyone like you steal their dream!


Are you saying that it is possible for others to steal your dreams? I am frankly puzzled by your belief. I have never believed that another person can steal a dream. They may make you rethink something, but if the dream is something you have, how on this earth is it possible to steal something that is in your head? This concept you have indicated is most curious. I would offer you a differing way of looking at this idea. I want to look at the dream idea and use the trip analogy if you don't mind.


If say I am going to go to Disneyland for a vacation and my father thinks that the way I am traveling (such as the route I take, the speed I drive, the vehicle I am using, etc.) to Disneyland is not perhaps the best and he questions me about it or says that I am being wrong by going that way, I have a few choices in responding. I can get mad at him and accuse him of trying to take away my vacation, or I can simply ignore him and do what I want, or I can think about his critique and ask him for a better method of traveling.


I would say that calling people dream stealers gives them too much power, when what they usually are doing is questioning your method of traveling, rather than questioning your destination. It is not the best logic to mistake questioning of your method with trying to stop you from achieving your goal. After all the goal [dream], or end result, is what you are ultimately after, isn't it? More time with family, more money, etc. The method of getting there is what should be able to be questioned. Don't let others say your goals are bad, but be willing to accept advice on the method of attaining them.


4 - You stated:
>>than I can't wate my time on speaking logically with you.


John, in what way do you believe that you [spoke] logically with [Tim] in your first post or your second? How did you use logic, such as facts and truth, in your discussion? I fail to see the facts other than the 'parrot' talk you used and the attacks on Tim. Your response, as such as it was, did not lend itself to helping your case. What you did was to pseudo-flame Tim. You did not respond in a manner that would benefit others, nor, in my opinion, strengthen your case. Unfortunately the systems usually condone and promote, if in a stealth fashion at times, these sorts of methods of attack. Usually they prefer you to attack the person's intelligence or character or knowledge or whatever attribute you can come up with. The person who is being attacked is very rarely – please note I avoided saying ‘never’ – rebutted by a logical mind with a good grip on their reason for being in the business.


5 - You stated:
>>what it is like to stand up for what you believe in, because if you don't


I think that you need to rethink that one John. You just indicated that Tim was not standing up for what he believed in, and you also indicated that perhaps he did not know how nor knew what it was like. How arrogant of you! You have no way of knowing that Tim lacks anything in this regard.


Now, I am not saying you are not standing up for what you believe in, but you have no basis whatsoever to state, or insinuate, that Tim does not know what it is like to do so. Your statement was obviously not very well thought out, or maybe you planned to attack Tim in this manner. Not a very good showing for someone who has big dreams and wants to do the right thing and make a difference by building the business. This criticism should not have come into the discussion. If someone was attacking your standing up for what you believe in, then you would be up in arms. You would probably be offended.


Just remember, someone cannot steal what you do not let them. Also someone can question your methods, without questioning your goals. Confusing the two is not beneficial.

Cliff

Posted by: Clifford Phillips on April 17, 2004 12:53 AM

First I'd like to say that you have a very informative site here. I'm especially impressed with how you are open to allowing both pros and cons of a system be expessed.

I have never been approached by anyone representing Quixtar or Amway and only just stumbled on this site via a search for "Business Opportunity" using google. I read all of the threads leading to this one as will as those related to this one.

I have some questions that I hope you and maybe others could answer. I'd like to start with the comments you made to the letter starting this thread.

>>"that's what the business model predicts."

Could you direct me to a link or reference to where I can find this perdiction?

>>"Yes indeed, condecension is a great sales technique."

I'm not sure how to take this statement. Does two wrongs make a right?

>>"The intent here is to make the reader or listener resentful. The goal with these kinds of arguments is to make them angry that someone else is making more money than they are, to trigger envy. To make the person unhappy (not thankful) for what they have, and make them start to violate the commandment that one should not covet what other people have"

When I was in high school my best buddy's father owned a trailer park and a couple of apartment houses. I still remember his father telling us "You can't get rich working for someone else."
Was I coveting (being sinful) to believe him and want financial independence (success) in my life?

>>"We can't be happy unless we make more than someone else does? Bad kind of thinking! In truth, you can do quite well by making others do even better -- real business is often a win-win position"

I agree, however how did you get this from the other persons quote? Also from what I've read here on your site that Quixtar is about "making others do ... better" thus a win-win real buisness. Am I wrong? please explain if I'm not.

>>"Quixtar is nothing like owning a real business: In a real business you make your money from this little external entity called the customer. In Quixtar, most the money comes from inside. That should be a huge tip-off to you that something's not right."

I own a buisness, yet I am also a customer of my suppliers (they make money). I buy parts that keep my buisness running and suppling product to my customers (I make money). Please explain what's not right about this?

>>"I'd rather see their balance sheet, and an open statement of where the money is going, with proven, audited records which demonstrate that the average participant previously made, not lost, money"

Am I to understand that what you are saying is that no buisness should be without risk? I'm sure you know that better than 95% of the buisnesses started in this country fail within the first five years of operation. Whould it be safe to say that if one were to try this buisness with true effort that it too would fail within the first five years? Can someone who has been trully working the Quixtar system for five years tell me the success rate after that amount of time and effort? Are they still losing money or are they making money? Or are have they moved on to something better?

From all that I have read here I am inclined to try and find an IBO in my area and get involved in this buisness system for at least one to five years. I understand that rewards do not come without risk.

Also I'd be interested (as would many of the other readers here) in hearing more about "I know of something much better than Quixtar".

Thanks again Tim for a very informative site.

Sincerly,

5e3stuff

Posted by: 5e3stuff on April 19, 2004 04:06 PM

5e3stuff,


Regarding "that's what the business model predicts", you wrote:

Could you direct me to a link or reference to where I can find this perdiction?

"The Plan" part of Quixtar works by transferring wealth from newer, "bottom" IBOs and customers to those "upline" IBOs in before them.

Lacking an infinite supply of potential new converts, this process breaks down. When this happens, some at the bottom will not see the return on their invested they expected. Not because they didn't try hard enough, but because there are not an infinite number of new converts availble, in the time frame needed to "the plan" profitable.

I explain this more fully here.


Regarding: "Yes indeed, condecension is a great sales technique":

I'm not sure how to take this statement. Does two wrongs make a right?

If I also came across as condescending, then I apologize.

My intent was simply to point out that mocking people's objections wasn't effective. People have real objections, and people posted real stories of loss or harm. In the face of such, laughter is hardly an appropriate (much less profitable) response.


When I was in high school my best buddy's father owned a trailer park and a couple of apartment houses. I still remember his father telling us "You can't get rich working for someone else." Was I coveting (being sinful) to believe him and want financial independence (success) in my life?

Envy is when you suddenly are unhappy with what you have (which was adequate before) because you have compared your situation to someone else's. Likewise, covetousness is when you envy, or unhealthfully desire, something your neighbor has.

There's nothing wrong with wanting to receive an income for your labor. There's nothing wrong with discussing which kinds of labor produce a better return -- for example working for yourself versus working for others.

These things are not envy. Working for youself is not envy. Envy and covetessness are states of the heart.

Working for yourself is a kind of employment or investment. And, being self-employed, myself, I'm not arguing against self employment.

Instead, I'm arguing against a sales pitch which teaches people to be envious, and walk around feeling bad because someone has something better. Someone will always have something better.

I hope this answers your question adequately.


>>"We can't be happy unless we make more than someone else does? Bad kind of thinking! In truth, you can do quite well by making others do even better -- real business is often a win-win position"

I agree, however how did you get this from the other persons quote?

Repeated citations that "your boss will always make more than you", combined with dark predictions that people will "never get ahead" as long as this is true.

It seems clear this is supposed to imply to the listener that there's something disadvantageous about this to him or her.

Do you disagree?


Also from what I've read here on your site that Quixtar is about "making others do ... better" thus a win-win real buisness. Am I wrong? please explain if I'm not.

That is certainly what many Quixtar advocates say about it.

But recall that not everything people say is true -- especially when there is money on the line. A person can lie, or simply be mistaken, regardless of how sincere they may feel. Sincerity is no safeguard against being factually wrong.

Is this true? It depends how you define "helping others do better." Certainly, there are some nice social interactions within Quixtar.

But financially, no, I do not believe that when all IBOs are considered, the Quixtar "plan" is a win-win business. It is, instead, a zero-sum game among IBOs, thus it is a win/lose proposition. Each IBO succeeds only by making life harder for another one. Ultimately some MUST lose.

As I said, it is a requirement of the business model; see the article I mentioned above for a more detailed explanation.


>>"Quixtar is nothing like owning a real business: In a real business you make your money from this little external entity called the customer. In Quixtar, most the money comes from inside. That should be a huge tip-off to you that something's not right."

I own a buisness, yet I am also a customer of my suppliers (they make money). I buy parts that keep my buisness running and suppling product to my customers (I make money). Please explain what's not right about this?

Nothing is wrong about what you've said.

But what you've said is nothing like "the plan".

In the economy, considered as a whole, there are two inputs: raw materials and labor. When you combine them, you create new wealth which didn't exist before.

To give a simple example, you have rocks, I have sticks and vines. We trade (we buy from each other, you might say). Now, with some chipping, polishing, and tying, we have axes. We are richer. Wealth was created. The world is a better place.

In your business, you buy parts from your supplier. Say you use them to fix something. A customer brings in a broken object. You spend your time using those parts to fix that object. You bill the customer for your time and the customer, not you, ends up paying for the parts. The world is a better place -- there is one less broken object -- thus wealth was created from your labor.

In Quixtar, you buy products. And part of the money you spend on that goes to cover the actual cost of the product and shipping (etc.). This is the same as any other economic venture. If this was all there was to it, I wouldn't be writing this.

Instead, I'd argue this first part only exists, in my opinion, to distract people from the other part of Quixtar...

In the other aspect of Quixtar, "the plan", you sign up many people. And thus the other part of the cost of each product goes to pay for the labor that your upline IBOs already did to sign you up. Your money will continually go to them.

Looked at on it's own, this part of the payment structure generates no wealth at all. Instead, it simply transfers wealth from bottom to top. Since each person has to sign up many others to make it "work" for them, at a rate far faster than population growth, it means that at some point you're going to run out of people.

And long before that, it's going to get harder, and harder, and harder as the pool of potential IBOs shrinks further and further. Meaning each person you sign up will have it harder than you did, and so on, until someone simply cannot meet the requirements of the plan because the supply of would-be IBOs is exhausted.

Again, this activity generates no wealth at all.

Thus, this part of the system is both unproductive and, according to my views, unethical, given the ultimate result, and the old rule "Do unto others as you'd have done to you."


>>"I'd rather see their balance sheet, and an open statement of where the money is going, with proven, audited records which demonstrate that the average participant previously made, not lost, money"

Am I to understand that what you are saying is that no buisness should be without risk? I'm sure you know that better than 95% of the buisnesses started in this country fail within the first five years of operation.

You are discussing risk.

I am discussing transparency.

These are two different concepts.

You are discussing starting your own business.

I am discussing signing up for a "system" which has been around for years, and has had millions of participants.

Again, this is completely different.

Let me put the question a different way, if that helps: If Quixtar really worked, and the average IBO, to this date, earned an attractive sum of money for their work, wouldn't it be to their advantage to use that information to sell the business?

Yet you do not see this, despite how attractive this would be if it were as lucrative, on average, as the typical sales pitch seems to imply.

So ask yourself: Why?


When I buy a stock (invest in a company), there's no guarantee the value of the stock will increase (risk). Yet the company publishes its quarterly reports, showing profits and losses, and I can easily see the stock's track record (transparancy).

When I become an employee, typically, they will guarantee me a certain minimum income, even in a sales position. Laws guarantee they will pay me if I work, according to the contract I sign with them.

In all these cases, where I invest in an existing organization and a certain transparency is provided -- enough to give a potential investor enough data to know, as far as the evidence can show, what kind of risk they are assuming.

Thus I am telling you to be concerned about situations where existing information, which (a) they must have and (b) should be helpful to their "sales pitch" -- if what they're telling you is all true, is being withheld.


Whould it be safe to say that if one were to try this buisness with true effort that it too would fail within the first five years? Can someone who has been trully working the Quixtar system for five years tell me the success rate after that amount of time and effort? Are they still losing money or are they making money? Or are have they moved on to something better?

The success rate of "the plan" is dependent upon "when you get in on it" and how hard you work. It's better to get in sooner than later. The more successful you are, the less successful other IBOs will be.

If everyone signed up for Quixtar, about half the people would make little or nothing at all from the plan.

So my objections aren't based on the assertion that nobody will make money. Some clearly will. My objection is that "the plan" itself is unethical.


From all that I have read here I am inclined to try and find an IBO in my area and get involved in this buisness system for at least one to five years.

I find this reaction fascinating.

Ah well: It's your life, and in this country it's not a crime -- though it is in many others.

I've studied the matter and concluded that either you or many other people will ultimately be hurt by your actions, should you choose to do this.

Further, if you also adopt the kind of half-honest sales techinque which I see typically being used, I'll find it sad to think yet another is doing that, too.

So, regrettably, I can't wish you good luck in this particular endeavor -- any more than I could wish someone to do well in any other activity which I was persuaded would hurt him/herself or others. It's nothing personal.

(And if you feel I'm wrong, you're more than welcomed to point out my errors.)

But in every other regard, I wish you the best.


I understand that rewards do not come without risk.

Of course. But all risks are not the same. Some things give you a better average expected return for your investment than others. Some organizations are more transparent than others. And not all businesses are equally ethical.

I hope you'll consider comparing Quixtar against all the other things you could do with your free time (to increase income), rather than just thinking about it alone, in a vacuum... if ethical arguments don't convince, I hope you'll consider the investment of time and effort the average IBO has made in order to earn $88/month per month.


Sincerely,
- Tim

Posted by: Tim on April 20, 2004 03:41 PM

As a future Quixtar IBO I just want to comment on both Tim and 5e3stuff. I feel that both arguments are valid for your own reasons but the fact about getting into and becoming a Quixtar IBO is very inexpensive ($125) and the risks are few. The biggest risk is losing $125 if you don't follow through with "The Plan". And any unethical behaviour on the part of IBO's trying to "sell" the Plan to future Quixtar IBO's is purely on their consiousness, their desire to be dishonost to get ahead in Quixtar to make more money. But the bottom line is that it's as simple as redirecting your purchase power to the internet and not Walmart or Costco. The fact that Tim is trying to say that this will be hurtfull to the "downline" is pretty rediculous. Why hurtfull? It's my investment and my decision to get in. I know that I'll be making money off of those downline from me in the future and I also understand that I will be making money for those above me. But the fact is that the companies like Goodyear Tires, KB Toys and OfficeMax (just to name a few of the hundreds) have signed up with Quixtar because they are willing to pass the marketing/utilities/insurance/etc. savings onto the IBO instead of putting into the actual "mortar and brick" that they have in the past. Noone loses. And if they do, it's a meager $125. Not a whole lot, unless you're so dirt poor that that's all you had in order to start a dream, but with no ambition to follow through with the plan. There is nothing saying that you have to quit your job to do this, either, it's in addition to it in the beginning. So you make of it what you want. Nothing comes for free.
The internet is the future, unless you really haven't been watching the global trends. It's easy and safe to buy online. Why not make a vehicle that helps the purshaser and the seller, which at the same time passes the saving back to the purchaser just by shopping through a particular portal (Quixtar). I understand it. And IF I ever wanted out...I quit. Nothing lost. But saying that it will hurt others is wrong. If it was so hurtful to others in the downline, there would be a lot of complaints to the better business bureau...the fact is that there are very few. Look it up for yourself.
In closing...my wife and I are excited about the earning potential of this business. We want to try because there is little risk and it grants us the opportunity to start a family and to stay at home with our family and watch them grow...not go to work and then pick them up from day-care to spend a few hours with them in the evening. NOT our cup of tea. We want to raise our family, not have the day-care worker do it for us. Just our view. See it as negitively as you want, Tim, but do you personally know anyone who has been "hurt" by Quixtar? Just asking.

-John F.

Posted by: John F. on April 24, 2004 02:16 PM

Just a response to the posting by John F.

I, too, have been researching the merits of Quixtar and have been called a couple times by an IBO seeking to enlist me. He gave me a sort of canned presentation, answered a few questions I had and gave me a CD or two to listen to.

Now, the next step is he and his wife want to come to our home and go through the "presentation". (Why his wife too?)

My work involves business analysis for mergers and acquisitions. It is data driven. I go for the facts, weigh the sensitivities about things that are unsure and try to make logical conclusions about "buy" or "pass" on opportunities.

I have to say that this opportunity stumps me. Looking into the workings of private companies is never easy, and this organization is certainly private. There are none of the elements of transparency one would have in a public company. There seem, from this string and many others on the web, to be widely differing opinions on how this works.

In my observation, most of those favoring getting into this organization make decisions based on the kinds of statements that John F. makes above. There are good solid reasons for getting in.... it doesn't cost much, I can buy at reduced prices, I can spend more time with my family, I don't have to work too hard for it, etc. And there are many more. What I'm missing is the actual data. Where are the numbers? Why do I have to buy for myself to get PV? Can a business be sound if, in the first presentation of it, you are shown that part of your profit is on your own purchases? If I look at the prices that are charged and I compare them to true street prices, you could do better not buying through Quixtar. And you certainly wouldn't be tempted to consume for yourself those items you wouldn't have bought otherwise, just to be building business volume for your "business". The logic seems screwy to me, but it's cleverly woven together with a lot of emotion.

I admit to having been somewhat swept up by the emotion of the speaker in the CDs I've listened to. However, it sounds so much to me like hype that I, personally, just can't go there. I'm going to tell my "potential sponsor" that he and his wife shouldn't bother to come by. The more I think about it, the more turned off I become.

I hope you make the right decision. My advice would be simply to do the research. If you don't find some hard data supporting a business plan (and don't get carried away by emotion), then I'd be sceptical.

Bill

Posted by: Bill on April 25, 2004 05:54 AM

John F.,

First, you're right -- the mere act of becoming a Quixar IBO is inexpensive. But part of the beauty of Quixtar is it leads people to seductively understimate costs, exactly as you just did.

I observed that my upline's sponsor, though she claimed to be only spending 8-10 hours a week, must have been spending most of her time working at Quixtar. (And her husband worked to support her so she was probably near full time, if not over.) Even if you only estimate 8-10 hours a week, that works out to a whopping 520 hours per year, or about 13 full work weeks. If you could earn $40k a year, that's about $10,000. Even at minimum wage, that's around $4,000 in lost cash for the same amount of work for one person.

Again, this is a conservative estimate. It doesn't count time spent on conferences, and my own sponsors seemed to be spending much more time than that on a weekly basis.

Now -- though your mileage may vary, there's the various things your upline will want you to do to remain "core" -- in my org, the sign-up was $200, not $125, but included a bunch of "free" product. Add $180-$360 a year for the voice mail they wanted me to get. Also four conferences -- about $100 each, with $200-$500 travel expenses... let's just call it 4 times $400 ($1,600). Then, they want you to get "standing order" for tapes -- for me, this would have been $400 per year. Next come the periodicals. My sponsor, who I would have been expected to model myself after, had been encouaged by her upline to subscribe to four of them at $20 each = $80 annually. Then there was the book of the month, which one is also expected to subscribe to, and that will run about $144 anually. In total, we're looking here at about $2,000 - $3,200 for signup and tools.

Still with me?

Next comes the product consumption. But you'd buy all that stuff anyway, right?

In 1996, the average IBO "earned" $88 dollars per month in bonuses. Of course, this isn't new wealth at all since it came out of increased product costs already paid by themselves or (more likely) another IBO. So there's at least $88 per month (perhaps more now, in 2004) markup, probably more to pay the various diamond bonsus and probably still more for Quixtar. Being conservative again, that means you're paying at least $1,200 extra in product costs annually.

Of course, there are other costs too -- all products bought through Quixtar are shipped -- even those like clothes and food which you'd seldom ship in small quantities. These costs are undoubtedly significant, but I'm being lazy and conservative, so I'll give them a pass.

Next is the question of whether you'd actually buy that much stuff anyway. If you have three kids, this might make sense for you. For me, it definitely didn't. Then there's also the matter of whether self-purchasing is going on -- where you buy more product than you need in order to keep up your PV/BV. I hear reports this is now starting to happen in Quixtar, as it did in Amway before the collapse, so that can increase your costs if you end up doing that -- think of it as a kind of donation to keep playing the game.

These are all the factors which I considered when I was approached, just as you were, regarding this "opportunity". Some people think if they work very hard for a year and receive nothing they're not "out anything"... I don't. I think when you're working, you should receive a return for that.

So, whether this is good or bad, we're looking at a sizeable investment... conservatively about $3,200 in actual invested cash per year, and $4,000 is opportunity costs if you're going to be "core". That's $7,200. Take less "conservative" assumptions -- higher markup (undoubtedly!), self-purchasing (sometimes), shipping costs (I've ignored them!), going a bit nuts and buying a lot of "tools" at the conference (as people tend to), and higher potential income than minimum wage, and you easily start to move into the $10,000-20,000 range.

And, in my experience, it takes people who are going to try to be dedicated at least years or more to get out of it, when they do. So multiply that annual investment by however long you'd like to decide to try doing Quixtar as your minimum time period.

Do the math and see how it works for you. All ethical issues aside, I can't possibly see how someone could get into a business like this without at least doing some of the research I mention above.

But hey, its sold seductively -- you'll have to drag these costs out of them -- and they often low-ball them if you don't corner them and watch what they do, not what they say. But once, you're in, there's pressure to do it the "right" way.

Next comes your statement which touches on the ethical issues, to effect of: It's just like buying all your products from Walmart or the Internet! No, John, it's nothing like that. Please re-read my explanation to 5e3stuff above. The "pyramidal" or "matrix" wealth transfer is nothing like Wal-Mart or the Internet. In fact, it's nothing like business at all, as most people think of it.

This post is just one in a series. You might consider clicking on the "Quixtar" topic (to the left) and reading some of the related articles or at least following the links I gave 5e3stuff.

They way you phrase your response, that I can be as "negative" as I "want to be" may be misleading you -- I didn't set out to be "negative" towards this opportunity, and more positive towards others. I was approached just as you were. But in the end, I decided it wasn't profitable for the average IBO, and that IBO's got ahead by screwing other IBOs, and that my participation, even if I were to benefit, would not be moral, by my lights. If you don' share even this minimal ethical rule with me, then I'd at least tell you to look at the expected investement and returns, out of at least simple greed.

I may be wrong, but I find it very intersting that folks selling Quixtar don't debate on the facts, instead they just seem unhappy that I'm telling what I've learned at all. That's not a good sign. Yet I'm simply putting my own experiences out there in hopes others might benefit by seeing the rest of the picture Quixtar leaves out.

Lastly, we don't all share the same ethics. At a minimum, I tend to think you shouldn't do things to other people that you wouldn't want done to you. By this simple rule, the Quixtar "plan" is not an ethical business, all questions of profit aside.

So, as a person who wants to see the world a better place, I feel it's reasonable to implore people not to participate in a system which makes money for a few by misleading so many.

And I consider being unethical a risk worth considering too.

But hey, that's just me. :-)

One more point: You seem to think losing $125 is nothing. Okay, that's your decision, but I'd post a review if I found even a breakfast cereal was bad or unhealthy. Do you get angry about movie reviews which tell people, on a very subjective criteria (much more than the above) to save their $8?

Then why I should wrong for trying to save people "only" $125, much less the larger investment of time and cash I contend Quixtar really wants you to make?

Oh, last question: Do I know anyone who's been harmed by it? Yes. I know a family who did Amway hard and heavy for something like a decade and finally dumped it. I know a guy who did Quixtar for two years and got out because of all the lies and deception. I have a friend who got into Quixtar a years ago, telling me confidently she was going to be quitting her crappy low-wage job any day now. She's poured tons of time into Quixtar, and still hates her job. Yet, Quixtar is apparently not making enough to compensate even for her rather low-wage job, which she hates, even after years worth of work and nearly a hundred people signed up. But she's got so much in it she won't be quitting any time soon -- just this next little bit!

Why don't people report it to the BBB? What's to report? As you've said, it's legal, and people choose to do this of their own free will. People join cults and give all their money to them too of their own free will -- tell me how many BBB complaints you'll find regarding that.

And, even if there was something illegal which went on, few would report it anyway: I work with computers. Millions of computers are hacked each year. Yet you see very complaints to the authority. How can this be?

Very simply: Nobody wants to admit they've been hacked. So people keep it covered up. Shame is a big factor, even when something is illegal.

But, for better or worse, Quixtar isn't illegal here, though it is a crime on many other countries. Thus, unless they violate their rules, there's nothing to report to the BBB.

My arguments are only (a) this isn't that profitable, (b) it's typically sold deceptively (though not illegally so), and (c) it isn't ethical by the "do unto others" rule, should you share it.

I hope you'll choose do things that benefit yourself and others.

Posted by: Tim on April 25, 2004 01:54 PM

Bingo, Tim (re: your 4/25/05 1:54 post).

One more thing could be said... If one does get caught up in the "flow" and commits to the meetings, the voice mails, the tapes, the books, the ... on and on ..., they are going to be much more inclined to self convince that it's the right thing to do (otherwise why would I be investing so much time and money in it?) Rather circular argumentation. More like a maelstrom, sucking energy and money away with the hope/dream of getting it back several times over.

I'm not often inclined to use the word "cult", but there are striking similarities in what I read in the comments on this site and the nature of some cults. Even when the evidence stacks against an aspiring IBO (not making as much as he/she thought; taking much more time than originally envisioned; buying one's own PV/BV up in stuff they may not really have otherwise bought; using and giving pat answers that one didn't think made sense when they first heard them but which now freely flow from one's own lips) the system seems to have them somehow just accept it all, sheep like, and continue to perpetuate some invisible momentum. I fear for those who are not financially stable enough or sufficiently logic-oriented to yield to the attractive but hollow belief that prosperity is (always) just around the corner.

For my money, being well informed about "both" sides of the question to become/or not/ an IBO has led me to a much more informed decision (and for me, it's NOT).

By the way, I thought your examples using $ and cents were superbly crafted.

Bill

Posted by: bill on April 25, 2004 09:05 PM

Just a few things to think about...


What do credible sources say about Quixtar.com
Business 2.0 magazine, NY Times, Microsoft?

As you research are you gathering opinions or facts?

How many people have you interviewed that have failed in the industry?
How many people have you interviewed making over 50K, 100K, or 200K Plus?

If they don't do advertising and instead they pay Independent Business Owners (IBO's) to get the word out about the site, how did they do over a billion in revenue without IBO's making money?
[Hint: IBO's were paid over 300 million in profits and bonuses late year.]

If like in all industries some people succeed with the business model and some fail.
Is it yourself image that makes you think you are going to fail or bad advice?

Maybe you are better then you think, and maybe there is more out there for you?

With the buy back guarantee on most products and information purchased what is the real risk? Wouldn’t those investments be a tax deduction anyway? Don’t you get products at wholesale and discounts too?

How does Quixtar, Alticor and Access Business Group rank compared to other companies financially? If I just know about Quixtar.com but don’t’ understand Alticor do I really understand much at all?

Did Quixtar IBO’s make more Profits in 2002 then Every Starbucks Combined around the World? (250mvs215m)

Would ongoing income help me control my Time as well as my money?

Why is the BBB Crest on the Quixtar.com Homepage if it is scam?

Is it true that the CEO of Alticor also sat as the chairman of the board for the United States Chamber of Commerce? (2002)

Can you just work your career for the rest of your life and "make it" by age 65? According to the social security administration the answer is NO. You don't have to work with Quixtar but you might want to have an open mind and consider your options.

Posted by: nwyouth on April 29, 2004 02:27 AM

nwyouth,

Why are people so confused? ...
Last time I checked similar and the same were two different words.

Last time I checked, nobody here had said Quixtar and Amway were "the same" company. So what are you responding to?

I love your line of reasoning! By your own words:

  • Same parent company
  • Parent company transferred IBOs from one to the other
  • Parent company actively controls both companies
  • Many of the same people involved in each
  • Same business practices

Thus ... what? Hilarious!

Look, if Amway sucked, and all of what you say is true, then it's not clear to me why Quixtar shouldn't suck in the same fashion. Likewise if Amway was the greatest thing ever.

Of course, if Amway was the greatest thing ever, one wonders it's no longer active in the US, eh?

Here's Hartway v. Gooch on the difference between Amway and Quixtar:

... on knowledge and belief, the Quixtar business is essentially the same as Amway's, only the name is different. Alticor has simply "repackaged" Amway's business concepts in the entity known as Quixtar. Today, Amway is often referred to as Quixtar and, for the purposes of this cause, the terms are interchangeable. Moreover, a distributor's respective position within the Amway network of distributors is essentially the same as within Quixtar's network. In other words, the networks are identical...

As far as your arguments about the BBB, you again made it clear you're not paying attention to the arguments made earlier in the thread, in which it was already admitted that Quixtar is legal, but also that legal, ethical, and profitable for IBOs are three completely different issues.

You're clearly more interested in marketing a product than in paying attention to a discussion. I may have to limit the free advertising space granted to Quixtar drones who don't bother to pay attention to nor respond to the discussion at hand.

Reader: Is this what you want to grow up to be?

Likewise, you encourage people to look into how much money Quixtar, the company selling the products, is making. But the question to a prospective IBO should be how much money those buying Quixtar products are making.

Of course, unless one is reselling the products at a higher price (not), it should be obvious: One doesn't make money buying products. :-)

Please remember that every "profit" and "bonus" paid out to IBOs is but a small fraction of the money already payed in to Quixtar from IBOs.

Normally, when you buy a product, and a fraction of the money is sent back that's called a "rebate". But when they send it to someone other than you, they call it a "bonus"!

("Quick! If you buy this computer now, we'll send $500 off the price to... someone else than you." How attractive!)

Remember: When you sign up to be a Quixtar IBO -- you do not necessarily share in Quixtar's profitability! You are not a shareholder or stockholder. You become the fuel by which its profitability is maintained.

Ponder that seriously.

nwyouth, thank you for giving me the opportunity to respond to another set of misleading arguments used to market Quixtar! Without your post, I would not have pointed out the huge difference between "Quixtar", the company (seller) -- what you want people to focus on -- and the very different IBO role (consumer) that people are actually being induced to assume.

I think the term that applies here is "misdirection."

Reader: Do you want to get involved with a "system" which, apparently, can only be marketed in such a deceptive manner?

Posted by: Tim on April 29, 2004 10:36 AM

"See", the problem with "quoting" off "a" forum is that you are assuming "the" guy you are "quoting" is an expert on the "subject" (in this case "Quixtar") we have no idea if "he" has even taken the time "to" sign-up a "client".
(it helps to wiggle the double fingers up while your reading above)
So quoting some guy here is like quoting Colon Powell on the subject of golf because both him and Tiger are black so obviously Colon Powell knows as much as Tiger about golf. Just because someone has signed the registration form for a Quixtar membership doesn’t mean they are an expert.
And that brings me to the main point, Mr. "quote" is definitely not an expert on teaching people how to supplement income on a part time basis. Quixtar’s publicity is from the underlining problem: people are looking for a way to supplement their money earned to time-spent ratio. "Quote" guy can’t help them, however "Quote" posts here without ever saying how he's doing in these areas (more month than money, causing heart disease to be the number 1 killer from stress) of his "quote" life?
"quote" guy, first and foremost you have nothing to offer, secondly without people out their presenting Quixtar no one would read these chat-posts anyway. Those people are the ones doing work; you just lazily sit at your computer. That’s the real problem here isn’t it, if Quixtar works then your desire to eliminate money stress from your own life is at the end of your own arm and your too lazy to accept that so you must try to stop as many people as possible so you can continue to believe you have no choice in the life your currently living. If you’re so smart about Quixtar and supplementing your income why did a guy in Michigan go Diamond in 18 months in 2002? He knows a little bit a supplementing income.
The people I work with would actually help you make a couple thousand a month. Aunt and Uncle did, Sister and Brother-in-law did. They are Platinum’s and Ruby’s so their income has nothing to do with tools either. So how about that? How are quotes going to get anyone past the fact that many people are relieving the stress in their lives through supplementing their incomes in Quixtar?
See quotes don’t do anything, and making posts on these sites doesn’t stop people’s desire to eliminate money stress. Well, at least I hope I am helping those of you reading this to look to someone that doesn’t fight about money every week, with their wife like this “Quote” guy does, for your income advice.
So my final statement will be that those of you reading this should understand that any one for Quixtar on these things isn’t necessarily an expert and those against just want to try and prove it doesn’t work so that they can blame everyone else for their own debt and stressful lives (you know how the ladies get, no matter how much mr. “quote” tries to reason he still has to try and convince the ole wife and you know she isn’t buying it so he tries to come on here and hone his arguing skills so he can justify to her that he should stay on the dart team down at the local bar rather than offer his children an ivy league college education)
They have nothing to offer you, so before you listen you should make them show you a profile of their daily lives. The point: “How many of you are just totally excited, I mean you are just pumped, for your kids to do what you do?”-Brad D. Triple Diamond
Ask yourself these questions: How about that guy in Michigan that went Diamond in 18 months, or what if this guy in this short story really does have an aunt and sister that have both went Platinum and Ruby respectively and are simply making a couple thousand a month?
One more thing “quote” guy should ask himself: If he knows something is so wrong with Quixtar why don’t he just sue, I mean America holds 60% of the worlds lawyers in its 8% of world population, I know you would be able to find someone.
Why did Quixtar do over 1 billion in sales in north America last year without getting sued out of business if what all these “Quixtar Blog” guys are saying is true, I mean we aren’t in a suing or lawyer lacking society.
Its like the guys trying to sue McDs for themselves being fat, you see they are too lazy to practice a little self restraint or exercise so they might as well sue for some free money.

Posted by: Quixtar is Fine on May 27, 2004 10:34 AM

Tim,

Bull's eye, every single point I made to you. That’s why you avoid everything in the message.
Your in debt, fight about money, totally stressed out, boss lies to you about promotion, lease your car, complain about the gas prices, but yet you expect people to come on here and read your messages like your an expert on supplementing income.
Supplementing income is the only reason why people investigate Quixtar, to get away from those stresses through creating a couple thousand a month. Yet if you did more than hide behind your computer and show these folks your profile everyone would realize your in worse shape than them in all the situations listed above and they would be a moron to listen to your opinion on money. The people I work with lend a hand out and come into your life and help when they are asked. And if you don't buy the CDs they burn your house down and kill your children, oh wait I guess the tools are optional and nobody does anything more than suggest you learn how to supplement your income from those who know how to supplement income if that is what you are interested in. There is a 10 second disclaimer at the end of every CD that says they are optional and you can return them and quit buying them at any time. So I mean if you want to blame McDs for being fat, now’s your chance because we live in a time when it is ok to place the blame on everything but your own laziness and get some free money.
Free money that’s what its all about, that’s why your mind directly goes to gambling, because its the hope of free money. The lotto, just another way the government can get taxes, but the hope of free money.
Quixtar isn't free money, that’s why it brings criticism upon itself. Sorry I am not smart enough to fit in a word other than criticism, because clearly that must be the qualifier to teach people how to supplement their income because you used it and you know everything.
I have never once bought a lotto ticket in my entire life and I played a quarter machine once in Vegas and won 10 bucks and left because I knew that I had done better than 90% of the people in the house. I earn money, I don't win it. I don’t know a lot about gambling, but I bet you do because you like FREE money.
If you know so much Tim, just sue Quixtar. I know you don’t have any money but you will be able to find a lawyer that would just take their fee from the winnings.
Clearly you are enlightening people with your in depth knowledge of business so you should go straighten out those measly billion dollar distribution business Quixtar people.
If you wait long enough, which I know waiting is what you do best, you will be able to sue others for your own laziness. Look at the McDs situation, the world is becoming full of you people can’t understand that going at buying a hamburger is simply a choice.

Have a great one Tim, at the very least I am allowing you to hone your skills to take on your wife tonight when she starts crying because you can’t afford to do anything fun over this THREE DAY WEEKEND, us job guys live for one extra day of freedom. YAHOO!!

Its funny because the majority of people that come on here are men trying to justify why they aren’t building a future of less stress for their families. Guys, the ladies aren’t going to buy any excuse and argument you throw at them, when there is no money in the account there is a serious problem brewing with shorty, she will kick your butt no matter what you learn off these sites.

Stick to people who can teach you to supplement your income if any of your money problems are bothering you and you got the guts to do something about it because Tim and other blog guys have more money stress than you do. That’s why they work so hard to justify, the wife is kicking their butt every night. And you don’t even have to “bet” on it, right Tim, because if you could look at Blog guys lives it would be a guarantee.

I have a future to build so I won’t be coming back this site.(I met with someone tues, 2 people on wed, one last night, and someone tonight).
I slashed their tires when they didn’t by a CD from me, come on get real ;>)

Sorry Tim, you got a lot to learn.

Posted by: Quixtar is Fine on May 28, 2004 12:35 PM

A critic is someone that knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

Meaning Tim should sue Quixtar if he knows so much about what is wrong with it. Wal-Mart currently has 10,000 million dollar lawsuits against them. Quixtar has 3.

So what gives man? Get some free money out of the idiots.

Seems like Laura is asking Tim to prove his legitimacy on supplementing income and business success? Prove it and let us all sleep better tonight.

1) Tim should sue Quixtar if he knows how to expose all of the wrongs they are doing.

2) Show Laura you income statement so she is able to prove you legitimacy for advise against the Billion-dollar distribution company.

Someone that attempts to discourage people from supplementing their incomes by working with a reputable company without offering an alternative is a loser.
Either they are scared it does work and when these 100s of people are succeeding it makes the loser look lazy. Or the Loser is educated on all the wrongs Quixtar is doing to the poor people around the country and they are just too lazy to get a lawyer and sue, because you know you can get a lawyer that gets their fees from the verdict.

So quit posting websites and hiding and start suing, thats all we ask. This is how we know your losers. You just like people to quit and fail and knowledgable people that use Quixtar as a servicing corp for their own business'challenge your laziness and you hate them for it.

Thats the truth of these blog sites. Are their any wealth blog advisers? They don't give any kind of business service so why compare them to a billion dollar business opportunity.

Posted by: I agree with Quixtar is Fine on June 14, 2004 04:21 PM

See Laura your guessing about Tim's legitamcy. You have no idea how successful or unsuccessful he is and that is the point of how stupid these sites are.

You can prove Quixtar's success and you have to defend guys like Tim with the hope that he know something.

You know darn well he doesn't know anything about business. Lets take a look at his business website? At the very least it is advertisement for his business.

He doesn't have one, thats the problem. He can't even afford the $40 a month domain name charge let alone site maintainance.

So keep taking his great business advise and you will end up learning and applying in your own life all that he knows about business. Good luck

Sorry I'm so truthful I know it stabs deep. I'm probably the best freind you have.

Posted by: To Laura on June 14, 2004 04:28 PM

Great questions, asked like a real businessperson. Summary of question "Just what is Quixtar doing that is making people out there great part-time income or ripping people off as these forums teach".
However, you aren’t going to find much negative when it comes to the Quixtar corp. following the rules if thats what you are looking for. Most definitely not in these moron forums.

Just Nutrilite for example has the largest research and development team of PhDs holding the most patents in the nutrition field. Nutrilite is 15 larger than its closest competitor GNC.

That is one example, but I'm sure you can find out a lot from Tim. He went to one meeting one time with one of his friends now he is the Quixtar expert. He will teach all he knows, so listen up if you would like to live as he does.

This will be my last post, he censored me because I was kickin his hiney in all the arguements. Ya free speech as long as you agree with the people yelling free speech, if you don't agree they censor you. True in business and politics.

Posted by: To Annie on June 27, 2004 06:57 PM

Oh, Quixtar Blog is down right now...OK whatever.

More like you are erasing posts containing all the trueths exposing you for how huge of a fraud you are.

Just like you block all the people that rip you a new one every post.

Just to update people;

Tim was invited to a meeting one time and decided not to do it, first of all we don't even know the group to which he was invited or the nature and size of the meeting. Nevertheless, in Tim's nature he is correct on every decision he has ever made, therefore his friend was wrong and he was right regarding the opportunity based on the one meeting.

Tim's thoughts:
Up tell now this is fine, you do your thing and I will do mine, there is nothing wrong with a difference of opinion. But then something terrible happened, my freind who I disagreed with began to see great results.
Oh no, what am I to do, I mean obviously I was wrong....wait that is inconsevable....I know... maybe the opportunity is bad....thats right....maybe I was right all along...yes my freind is the biggest lier and has a huge deal with the devil... what should I do knowing this new information...I will post all these bad things regarding everyone in Quixtar even though a vast majority of my points only pertain to a small few groups using Quixtar.

Yes now my freinds business will not grow as fast and she will not have success, yes once again the great Tim was right all along.

Posted by: on October 2, 2004 11:52 AM

I went to a meeting with one of what they call sponsers. I listend to each and every word these people had to say. Some of what they push across is true. We all do wish to some degree we had "more". What really turned ME away are the success stories. One story was of a lawyer quiting a successful practice, an engineer quiting his nine to five job that made him what I consider a high income. The one that really stuck to me is about a doctor that quit his practice because now he has transitioned into freedom. No more always on duty, no more beeper. He was free to spend time with his family. I looked at that story this way. There are two types of doctors in the world: those that do it because it pays well and those that do it because they want to help people. I don't believe he became a doctor to help people. Nor did the lawyer. These guys quit practices that were benificial to society. I asked myself "Is this the kind of person I want to take advice from?" Was his pursuit of the almighty dollar more important to him than truly helping others? What makes me think he cares about my financial future. I believe in education. I do believe there are valueable things to learn from these organazations, but I don't believe in the implied results are as easy as they make it out to be.

Posted by: Rob on August 13, 2005 12:10 AM

I just read through the first part of the page, not the comments. There is nothing in there that describes the techniques these people use to make you feel like a "winner". Already being in two of these meetings, the people are trying to be most positive about the business. The first meeting, a family member being my host, gave out samples. This person could not stop talking about it every time he was over. I finally told him to shut up. The second person, a friend, who once again hosted me (he was not sure if it was quixtar), and the people made the meeting a lot more interesting. They did not discuss any part of the ordering portal or biznet. But I guess it is quixtar because of XS products. The nine steps to success included two steps that required people to listen to tapes and read books. I checked on the site and looked around for products. The one laser printer was only $300; the best price I could find anywhere. Most of the other products were insanely overpriced. The XS protein drink averaged to $3.00 a bottle. You can get the same nutrition from a mix which lasts a lot longer. The TV dinners are 6 for ~$23.00 Who in their right minds would pay $3.88 for a TV dinner? They are main dishes with no sides. I guess if it was a few pounds of it per dinner, it would not be too bad, but it was not stated on the site. For all of their associations with various companies, they are only getting products people do not want. All I saw on there were celerons and pentium IIIs for computers. V-neck sweaters were sold for $39.99. This section is always discounted in my local retail stores (about $30.00). The polo-shirts are the same price as most retail stores when they do not have a sale, but I would think the retail stores would have more selections (quixtar has blue, green, yellow). I THINK all these "partner" companies are only using quixtar to get rid of products that do not sell. I have not looked into the partner sites, since I cannot get into it. If someone knows more about this please reply another post or something.

Posted by: Anon on September 23, 2005 11:53 AM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Demanding an Apology from Bush | Front Page | Page Two | Inside the mind of Oliver Stone »