|
An homage to a dying network... As I started to read this article, I thought, I've heard some people say Newsday is biased. So far, what I've read has been good. Let's see what this says. Ah, well, I was wrong, they were right. First...
Here's their idea of "less blustery" and "more concerned with the perception of balance":
And, in case we might have any doubts as to the author's biases:
Oh Please! You slay me with laughter! Is Newsday doing satire too? Didn't we just read Janeane's name-calling? The author speaks as though calling Bush "chimp", calling conservatives "racists", and mindlessly repeating "Anybody But Bush" was some sort of nuanced approach. My question isn't whether liberals can simplify issues -- from my direct experience, the question is whether many or most liberals can fail to simplify them so far that crucial distinctions are lost. Now we get to the meat of the matter:
The heigth of cluelessness! Did the author pay any attention to Air America's debut in which they rudely and endlessly berated Nader for trying to offer an alternative to the Democratic Party? Of course, this would be more convincing to me if Ralph Nader believed his own purported ideals, which he clealry doesn't. Gotta be tough to be a liberal. Even the candidates you support don't actually believe in the ideas they run on. UPDATE: Sorry, didn't realize this was an opinion piece. It wasn't readily visible from Newsday's presentation. The title that came up in Google was different than the current "title" tag, the latter which contained the world "Opinion". Other points made still hold. Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |