The BBC, a few weeks ago:
US light crude settled at a record closing price of $51.09 on Tuesday, up $1.18, having hit a $51.29 high....
Traders said the market had responded to a US Department of the Interior report stating that more than 15 million barrels from the Gulf had been disrupted over the past three weeks by the hurricanes....
Some traders have blamed the latest price rises on market speculators. "It is speculation, pure speculation," said Fadel Gheit, market analyst with Oppenheimer. "It is a bubble like the internet bubble. It is not justified by supply or demand."
News Interactive, today:
CRUDE oil futures rose to a record in New York for a third day on speculation US demand for heating oil would deplete supplies this winter.
"Consumer demand is still very robust on the heating oil side and this is what's really driving these markets into a frenzy," said Arjuna Mahendran, Singapore-based chief Asian strategist at Credit Suisse Private Banking.
Prices have risen in 19 of the past 22 sessions.
(Remember, they're just guessing the reason behind the speculation they see driving up oil prices. All know they know for sure is that they see speculative trading driving up the oil prices; the reasons suggested are analyst's interpretations.)
Recently, Don Luskin has been pursuing an interesting lead: Apparently, he feels, someone has been gaming the election-outcome shares on TradeSports:
There have now been four separate "speculative attacks" on the market in futures contracts on Bush's re-election probabilities traded online at the Dublin-based website Tradesports.com....
The attacks involved massive sell orders placed by a single individual -- the same individual all four times -- according to a spokesman for Tradesports. Each attack caused a massive temporary drop in the price of the Bush re-election futures. The most recent one, last Friday at about 1:30 EDT, whacked the Bush futures from a price of 54 (indicating the market's estimate of a 54% probability of Bush's re-election) all the way down to a price of 10 (indicating a 10% probability) -- in just eight minutes. Six minutes later the futures were back to 54. That's the equivalent of an 8000-point crash in the Dow Jones Industrial Average -- followed by an 8000 point recovery, all within 14 minutes.
Four attacks. One individual.
I'm no expert, but I'd guess there were probably quite a number of people who had enough cash to game TradeSports. And it seems like kind of a minor aspect of my life, anyway. But there were some reader responses that did raise my eyebrows:
Many readers have asked whether it's possible that Soros is manipulating the oil futures market, driving it higher to make Bush look bad. Well, I have no direct information on this. But as a long-time trader, I can tell you for sure that the oil market has speculation and manipulation written all over it. Could it be Soros? Sure. It might be. No evidence that it is. But it certainly could be.
Oil? Now, that's intriguing. And scary. As you can see above, it appears there are a lot of people -- not just Luskin -- who feel that high prices we're seeing now do have a singificant speculative component.
It sure could be Soros.
That's not paranoid to suggest: Here's a man who has single-handedly bankrupted the Bank of England to become wealthy, and also single-handed touched off the huge Asian crash and depression of the 90s through speculative monetary trading (arbitrage).
Would the man who has appointed himself "American's conscience" be willing and able to cost you at the fuel pump in order to get what he wants?
It's certainly not dissimilar to things he's done to the millions of citizens of other countries in the past. He's repeatedly stated he wants a powerful global government, and it stands to reason that Kerry is more in line with those plans that Bush.
Creepy.
If there any truth to this-- and I'm no expert -- but I'd guess we should look for an steady high level or increase as we go into the final weeks running up to the election, and a big drop afterwards.
I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next person, but please allow me to interject a little sanity.
Of course there is a significant speculative component to oil prices. It is a futures market, no? And speculation is running rampant for good reason. There is a strike in Venezuala. There is a threat of civil war in Nigeria. The fields in Iraq are under the threat of sabotage. Russia's largest producer has announced that it wants to raise prices. OPEC's influence on stable prices just ain't what it used to be. Whatever George Soros is, he is not the bogeyman for oil prices.
Now about the political futures market. The "speculative attacks" by one individual do not merit any comparison whatsoever to the Dow Jones. In Don Luskin's own words the attacks consisted of placing sell orders with a market value of "tens of thousands of dollars". There is a very long list of people who could accomplish that. On the other hand, the 30 stocks of the Dow Jones have daily dollar trading amounts in the BILLIONS. Comparing Tradesports to the Dow is like comparing apples to 500 pound giant pumpkins. Trying to conclude that George Soros pulled a few hundred thousand dollars out of his couch to disrupt the Tradsports futures contract because it could get John Kerry elected is just plain nutty.
I like a lot of Don's columns on Smartmoney and MSN Money, but he is way out in left field when he tries to make a connection between the political futures and the market indices. The trading volume is exponentially different and the market depends on way too many factors to care which Yale graduate gets elected President.
I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next person, but please allow me to interject a little sanity.
Of course there is a significant speculative component to oil prices. It is a futures market, no? And speculation is running rampant for good reason. There is a strike in Venezuala. There is a threat of civil war in Nigeria. The fields in Iraq are under the threat of sabotage. Russia's largest producer has announced that it wants to raise prices. OPEC's influence on stable prices just ain't what it used to be. Whatever George Soros is, he is not the bogeyman for oil prices.
Now about the political futures market. The "speculative attacks" by one individual do not merit any comparison whatsoever to the Dow Jones. In Don Luskin's own words the attacks consisted of placing sell orders with a market value of "tens of thousands of dollars". There is a very long list of people who could accomplish that. On the other hand, the 30 stocks of the Dow Jones have daily dollar trading amounts in the BILLIONS. Comparing Tradesports to the Dow is like comparing apples to 500 pound giant pumpkins. Trying to conclude that George Soros pulled a few hundred thousand dollars out of his couch to disrupt the Tradsports futures contract because it could get John Kerry elected is just plain nutty.
I like a lot of Don's columns on Smartmoney and MSN Money, but he is way out in left field when he tries to make a connection between the political futures and the market indices. The trading volume is exponentially different and the market depends on way too many factors to care which Yale graduate gets elected President.
Posted by: Jeff on October 22, 2004 09:24 AM