Current Features

Gouverneur Morris
America: A Christian Nation?
Ya Gotta Have Faith!
Not-Hearing: Two Examples
The Paradox of Public Advertising
Cleave; Sanction
Doomsday Clock: False Authority Fallacy
Politicians and Their Children
Eric Boehlert Knows Inner Motives!
What is the Purpose of Democracy?
One Mess Created, Time to Create Another
Christians Pursuing Happiness

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Insignificant Thoughts
Insomnomaniac
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
The Right Scale
Sinking in Quixand


Pick Your Ethnicity!

Leftists are so weird. Tonight I heard a woman claim that it wasn't any of our business whether Ward Churchill was Indian or not. She said he could choose to be whatever race he wanted to be. Another supported stated: "He writes from an indiginous perspective, which is a state of mind."

You know, genetically, I'm from Danish and Welsh descent.

But I think I'm going to choose to be African American for a while.

So please, congratulate me on my new ethnicity.

Maybe I'll be Hispanic when I get bored with that.

Or Native American. That seems to have worked out well for Ward. Maybe it's time I got me some of that.

And what is the "state of mind" necessary to be one of these groups? Leftist, of course. Amazingly, just by being a leftist, you can be any ethnicity. And, even if you are black, Hispanic, or whatever, if you're NOT a leftist, you're not really that ethnicity either.

Could I spout leftist doctrine for $110,000 a year? Hmmm...

Comments

Imran asks: You have no idea what it is to be like non-white guy do u

I'm not sure how to answer that. On one hand, I could always say the lame "I have lots of friends who aren't..." line, and it would be true. And I'd like to think I've learned something from all that dialogue, reading, and thought.

On the other hand, I'm perfectly comfortable confessing, at a deep experiential level, I have no clue what it's like to be another ethicity. (But isn't that true of everyone?)

But that's precisely my point: I have no more "life-experiential" clue about what it's like to be, say, black than Ward Churchill does to be Indian. He's every bit as white as I am, and every bit as non-Indian.

If he can be "Indian" by just reading about it, having opinions about it, and perhaps having hung around with Indians, then I can be quite a number of ethnicities on the same basis.

The positions are equally absurd.

Except in my case, everyone understands that. In his case, for some reason, his supporters imagine his political views verify his authenticity. As though the true test of being a Native American was holding extremist anti-American views.

(Don't try telling a Navajo that!)


And your statement seems a bit telling too, as it, perhaps unconsciously, divides the world up into "white" and "non-white". (This is common, so I'm not faulting you particularly.)

The idea implied is that approximate skin tone determines affinity and outlook -- as though a Christian Laotian refugee will have more in common with a Jamaican Rastafarian, Nepalese Buddhist, or Saudi Wahabi cleric than with a white Christian.

But that's absurd. For example I had far more in common with a very black African girl I dated than with many white left-leaning European friends. (I've gotten the same impression from several other African acquaintances as well.)

Sure, skin color has some impact. But I personally think its influence pales (haha) in comparison to religious beliefs, political ideals, upbringing, culture, and/or personal style.

But hey, that's just one man's opinion, and I'm open to evidence to the contrary.

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on February 23, 2005 02:57 AM

Anti-white racist joke, eh?

So would you view it as 'racist' if someone told a similar joke about a Muslim in Africa capturing slaves?

(Or one in Europe?)

Or do you hold others to different standards than the one you hold yourself to?

There are people of every race and color who have done both bad and good. We should look at the individual, not some unchosen external characteristic, nor what someone who looked like them did.

Racism is truly an equal-opportunity employer.

If you're asking if I've ever been attacked, assaulted, or spoken badly of simply because of the color of skin, the answer is yes, to each. My first memory of meeting a person of a different skin color involves me being physically assaulted by them, and being told, explicitly and directly, it was because of my skin color. In fact, a parent was there, instructing them to do it, and instructing them to tell me it was because of my skin color. To name one incident.

Why are these details of my personal life so important to you?

And what bearing does it have on the idea that race isn't socially constructed?

It sounds like you have an axe to grind.

Perhaps you too could assault me if it would make you feel better? I will offer you my face, and you may strike it. Then I will turn the other cheek so you can strike me again. Go ahead, take your hatred out on me. I have a nice, white face which has been struck many times; I will pose you no threat.

If someone of a pale skin color has hurt you, then I hope you'll forgive them as you youself would wish to be forgiven. You truly do have my sympathy, and I'll agree with you that that was a very bad thing to do. Sadly, I cannot apologize to you on their behalf because I do not speak for another 'white' person any more than I speak for other right-handed ones. That's between you, them, and God.

I believe we all have quite enough to account for for own on individual sins, without needing to go blaming others for things which someone completely different did. The world is bad enough as it is, Imran, without that kind of nonsense.

Somehow, we've learned to condemn racism when it happens in people of one skin color, but we think it's suddenly okay for another. No, it's not. It is a profound form of hatred not to hold 'minorities' to the same ethical standards that the 'majority' is to be held. It means that less is expected because they are capable of less.

You have my sympathy, and I will pray for you, and you have my agreement that all such injustices are wrong.

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on March 16, 2005 11:53 AM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Must! Find! Gay! Gene! | Front Page | Page Two | Cluessless About Marriage »