Current Features

Gouverneur Morris
America: A Christian Nation?
Ya Gotta Have Faith!
Not-Hearing: Two Examples
The Paradox of Public Advertising
Cleave; Sanction
Doomsday Clock: False Authority Fallacy
Politicians and Their Children
Eric Boehlert Knows Inner Motives!
What is the Purpose of Democracy?
One Mess Created, Time to Create Another
Christians Pursuing Happiness

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Insignificant Thoughts
Insomnomaniac
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
The Right Scale
Sinking in Quixand


Conspiracies Within Conspiracies

History repeats.

Democratic Congressman Maurice Hinchey, regarding Rathergate:

Now, I mean, I have my own beliefs about how that happened: it originated with Karl Rove, in my belief, in the White House. They set that up with those false papers. Why did they do it? They knew that Bush was a draft dodger. They knew that he had run away from his responsibilties in the Air National Guard in Texas, gone out of the state intentionally for a long period of time. They knew that he had no defense for that period in his life. And so what they did was, expecting that that was going to come up, they accentuated it: they produced papers that made it look even worse. And they — and they distributed those out to elements of the media. And it was only — what, like was it CBS? Or whatever, whatever which one Rather works for. They — the people there — they finally bought into it, and they, and they aired it. And when they did, they had ’em. They didn’t care who did it! All they had to do is to get some element of the media to advance that issue. Based upon the false papers that they produced.

Much of the left refused to admit the documents might be forged. Now, they're finally forged, but Karl Rove did it! And of course, CBS still has no responsibility for vetting the documents, still. Even funnier, Congressman Hinchey has no idea who Dan Rather works for.

Recently, in frustration, I wrote:

Yes, every time you show some left-wing evidence is fake, that fraud itself becomes further evidence of how evil and insidious the nefarious Bush administration is! It never becomes evidence that there are a lot of nut-jobs over on the left who have no ethics and will stop at nothing to scare people, and who are also generally incompetant in doing so.

History repeats.

Comments

Dear fruitcake:

First, I'm not impressed with simulating the same conversation you pretended to have here on my blog. Simulated conversation is one of the things I have extremely little tolerance for. I'd advise you get serious help.

Second, I've asked people to stick to the topic. Pretending to be someone who "has the ear" of Frist, and is looking for bribes (Democrats are getting so freaky these days, what a pathetic setup) -- and, of course, is doing so publicly on a blog (duh!) is one of the stupidest things I've seen in a while.

Third, I don't need 14 reposts of the same exact comment.

Fourth, I've asked people not to engage in ad hominem arguments, which your dialog seems mostly to be composed of.

So, please find a better hobby elsewhere, little troll. You serve to illustrate the bizarre depths some Democrats have sunk to these days, but I hardly think we need more evidence of that. I still hope there are some honest, principled liberals out there, but manipulative individuals like you give them a bad name.

Just a question: Does it ever occur to you, given the dishonest way in which you're acting, that you're on the "wrong side" of the truth and integrity? I mean, what, you're going to spread goodness and light by lying, deceiving, and sneaking around in the dark under pseudonyms?

- The Management

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on June 2, 2005 08:01 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Noam Chomsky and the Liberal Tissues of Lies | Front Page | Page Two | What's Wrong with Anti-Trust Laws? »