|
Of course it was the sermon. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that. Terry stormed out of church, angry, angry, angry. It wasn't the color of the chairs that day, or a bad fashion choice someone had made. It made him angry enough to dislike the pastor. It made him angry enough to mention the dispute to his mom. It made him angry enough to kill the pastor, and attempt to take out his whole family. It wasn't just a flip of the coin that determined that Terry attacked his church, rather than his place of work. Instead, it was a key part of his motivation for the killings. The reason the police can't solve this one is because they're projecting their own motivations and understandings onto Terry. They seem to believe the sermon would only be significant if it contained Doomsday predictions. No, they've got it backwards, and the history of Terry's involvement in the church should be enough to indicate so. To the contrary, Terry clearly liked Doomsday predictions. When the WGC started getting into more traditional Christian teachings, Terry blocked out the new material, and instead went with a group which focused more on dire prophecy. As a friend of Terry's said:
Clearly not for Terry -- he loved that stuff. And what didn't he love? Fieldler also indicated that when the WCG started focusing on more orthodox Christian topics and views, Terry simply deflected it and blocked it out: Does not compute. So, when they track down information about the sermon in question, what do they find?
Precisely. An evangelist's job is to convict. An evangelist's job is to expose the sin in your heart, and make you realize the need for God's forgiveness. One of the aspects of Armstrong's teachings, I am given to understand, is that in latter years he focused a lot on human potential; he also repudiated the Christian belief in "original sin". If someone had trouble admitting the evil within themselves, such a philosophy might make a good place of refuge. And Terry, given his drinking habit, seems to have indeed been running. I do not claim to know much about LCG culture, it sounds like this evangelist might have been of a somewhat orthodox Christian inclination, at least on these topics. If so, the sermon is exactly what we might expect: a mundane but powerful set of arguments about our own sin or iniquity, chosen by a pastor who has similar inclinations. This is something Terry had clearly rejected before. There was no particular reason to think he'd like it this time. The police and others can't see the importance of this because they're apparently overlooking Terry's motivations, as spelled out though his history of church involvement choices. For a more complete explanation of my theory on Terry's motives, read this, and also this. In depth analysis of the church shooting case: http://churchcase.workplaceviolence101.com/ Posted by: Larry J. Chavez on March 23, 2005 08:50 AM Charles Bryce is an evil man. Please do not believe anything he has to say. He knows exactly what sermon was given on the day Ratzmann walked out. It gives me chills to think that he contributed, via his sermon, to the tragedy. I have no doubt in my mind that his "so-called sermon" was filled with..."I am perfect and you need to come up to my standard you pathetic peons." Been there and done that. But no more! Go back and talk to the families now and see just how supportive the hierarchy of LCG has been for the victims. Posted by: on June 16, 2005 09:04 PM Bryce is at the core of what tripped Terry off. Most members got help from other sources than the church Government. Posted by: on June 12, 2006 09:26 PM HAHAHAHA. "I am perfect and you need to come up to my standard you pathetic peons." If I hadn't listened to a fair number of Mr. Bryce's sermons in the past, that statement would have been fairly funny. But seeing as how I have, it's freaking histerical in it's inaccuracy. As admitted by the author above, "I do not claim to know much about LCG culture" should apply to pretty much everyone commenting. Please don't condemn that which you have no real knowledge of. Posted by: Mike on December 4, 2006 11:10 PM I attended that congregation and sat in those seats. I spoke with Mr Bryce a few days after the shooting, after he gave a message to a group of COG (Living, United, Global, etc) members and former members. All these people were mourning the death of loved ones before any funeral happened. Mr Bryce gave one of the most uncaring, unsupportive, cold messages I have ever heard. Maybe it was not his finest hour? "Who ever has an ear let him hear." There is truth in the comments listed above. I am not sure this really is the forum for airing the facts of the matter. Those involved have talked about it amongest themselves. Jesus is healing the hurts as HE promised.
Posted by: dale on December 15, 2006 03:52 PM This theory is absolutely absurd. Terry had major problems he was wrestling with, one of them being his desire to be married. So now someone indicates he had a drinking problem also. Actually, I found that tease of that morning to be an example of the coldness to his problems that could very well have existed in the local congregation. For that same lack of love is waxing colder in LCG congregations all over the globe today, and that coldness is a result of wrong church Government from the very top (except for Jesus himself). Someone notes Bryce's sermon before the funeral as being "uncaring, unsupportive, and cold". That is totally the opposite of what many others thought. There were those who actually thought he did an amazing job. So I guess one hears what they want to hear. Frankly, I personally suspect this whole web site might have been conjured up by someone who is afraid that Mr. Bryce will do a big work, and that person may be Dr. Meredith himself. He has no whims of allowing a lay person managing a whole web site of Biblical discourse as long as it serves his purposes. Finally, God's ministers are to cry aloud, and spare not, and show my people their sins. I know of no one who does this in a more balanced, caring, loving, concerned, and well thought out manner than Mr. Bryce. His sermon on paying one's taxes and modesty is one example of this, but you won't be able to hear it because Living immediately took Bryce's sermons off the air after Merideth kicked him out for supporting the traditions and doctrines passed down by HWA. Let's stop name calling and get back to the serious business of spreading the true gospel rather than an unbiblical and untruthful one spread by RCM and crew. Let's not make stories up about people. Let's love others in our local congregations instead of trying to excuse away Terry's or a local congregation's problems by trying to place the blame on one man's sermon. If one sermon causes one to shoot his own, the man was clearly sick for a long time before. His own congregation needed to see that and care for him and love him, instead of teasing him, etc. Posted by: Benjamin on August 8, 2007 11:58 PM Frankly, I personally suspect this whole web site might have been conjured up by someone who is afraid that Mr. Bryce will do a big work, and that person may be Dr. Meredith himself. You would be quite wrong. As I said above, I am not in nor related to the WCG. Do a search on, say, Quixtar, and you'll find that this blog has a long history of focusing on other topics -- it does not exist simply to promulgate some particular theory or blame someone on this particular issue.
I think you're confusing "blame" and "trigger." Above, I only suggest the sermon clearly "set Terry off." That doesn't mean it was bad or inappropriate. In fact, if you'd read the article above closely, you'd find that I suggest it may have carried a godly conviction that Terry didn't want to hear. I could be wrong about that, but first let's at least be clear on what has been said, okay? And don't fret that others have been able to post here, just as you have: All are welcomed on Random Observations provided they follow the few, simple rules regarding comments. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on August 9, 2007 01:48 AM It is absolutely absurd to claim that a sermon by Charles Bryce caused Terry to go and kill others in LCG. Terry had longstanding problems of unemployment, longstanding cravings for a mate, and as one person claims above, a drinking problem. These problems were working on Terry. One person claimed above that Mr. Bryce before the funeral gave one of "the most uncaring, unsupportive, cold messages" he had ever heard. Btw, it is a minister's duty to speak up and show people their sins, as is noted above in the comments. I know of no minister who is able to do this in a more balanced, caring, concerned, and well thought out manner than Mr. Bryce. His sermons, had they been not immediately pulled by LCG after they terminated him for standing courageously up for the traditions and doctrines set down by HWA, would amply demonstrate this. His sermon on modest dress and paying taxes was a perfect example of his balanced and caring sermons. Mr. Tim Walters, who owns this site, are you essentially an arm of Mr. Meredith like Cogwriter's Bob Thiel is? It would certainly seem so based upon what you have written? Or have you had Mr. Bryce tell you things that you didn't want to hear that you have gone to such great lengths to assert such a powerful maligning of him? Let's get back to the business of being Christians and getting the true gospel out to the world, not one based on the twisting of scriptures out of the context of all the other scriptures on the subject as is being done now by the trio at LCG. Posted by: Benjamin on August 9, 2007 11:48 AM It is absolutely absurd to claim that a sermon by Charles Bryce caused Terry to go and kill others in LCG. What is absolutely absurd is your apparent inability to read and comprehend simple English. I did not suggest it "caused" the murderous rampage, and quite clearly just stated I had not "blamed" his crime on that sermon. Do I think it was the trigger? Yes: it was clearly what "set him off" -- just as an aggrieved postal worker might go nuts over being justifiably corrected for a mistake. But I cited the same things you just mentioned -- his drinking habit and possibly trouble "admitting the evil within [himself]" as the core issues. Which part of that are you so determined not to get?
I'm not sure if you've noticed it yet, but people of all opinions and outlooks are allowed to come here and post their views and experiences. Just as you have. I'm sorry if someone else's views and claimed experiences offend you, but that just a part of life (and a free society) that we all have to learn to cope with. I am not "dale". Mmmmkay?
I have no idea what "Mr. Bryce" said specifically in his sermon, but once again, for the reading-comprehension impaired, please note (this is the last time I will repeat this) that I assumed, in the article above, rightly or wrongly, that it was a fairly godly sermon. Do I have hire a skywriter to write this over your house before you notice this? Sorry to be a bit snippy, but I do not suffer fools lightly. Which, frankly, you're being. Here I am, having written almost the same opinion you offer, and you're apparently so determined to make an enemy that you can't be bothered to even read what's been said.
First off, I am not, and do not know, a person by that name. Second, please read the comment I just wrote to you, above, for the answer to your question about your church, and my lack of relation thereto, and involvement therein. Also read the comment rules, regarding why you're now in violation of them. Hint: it has to do with the fact I don't like repeating myself to people who can't be bothered to read.
Before you get the "true" gospel out to the world, you're going to have to learn some basic etiquette. Such as not wandering onto some stranger's blog and falsely accusing him of absurd conspiracy theories. And making other false statements. "Benjamin", you need to get out more: the world does not revolve around whatever little intra-church quarrel you have going on. Out of about 1,500 posting here, three relate to the Ratzmann shootings -- and those only because they happened near my former home in Wisconsin. You can easily verify this in the manner I just suggested (or click here to go to the front page and look around), should you develop some interest in truth. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on August 10, 2007 02:15 AM After a couple of years I just read..."Please don't condemn that which you have no real knowledge of." Sorry to burst this person's bubble... but I do have "real knowledge of" the LCG culture. Over 35 years of my life was spent under the direction of C. Bryce, Rod Meredith and others just like them. I applaud the strength it took for those willing to speak up in the congregation and tell truthfully what the events were that led to Ratzmann's rampage. The woman that teased him when he was at his weakest moment reminds me of someone that attended our local congregation. If the teaser was similar in nature to our own busy-body, the damage that tease could have caused would be huge. I have seen the hurt in peoples' eyes when our busy-body did her church-lady duty and put people in their place. Yes, the blame certainly rests on Ratzmann. But, based on what I have seen in our local congregation I can make the assumption that he was a likely product of the pressure exerted on him from the ministry and certain members of the congregation. I am writing this in the hope that it will somehow encourage others to look outside their little group. They only have the authority over you if you allow them to do so. It is not the end of the world if you go elsewhere. You have not committed the "unpardonable sin" or "hardened your heart" should you choose to attend another church, meet a potential mate outside of your group, or seek professional help when you know there is a need. You are merely exercising your right to be a free moral agent. Anonymous: Thank you for speaking up. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on June 30, 2008 09:42 AM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
It wasn't just the sermon that angered Terry Ratzmann. Just before the service on the fatal morning, Ratzmann showed up without a gun. He was approached by the sister of Tom Gieger, the church spokesman. She actually teased Ratzmann about walking out on the service on Feb 26.
“Geiger said Ratzmann did react inappropriately to a joking comment made by his (Geiger's) sister before Saturday's service, in which she teased him about having walked out early Feb. 26. Ratzmann's face reddened, his jaw clenched and he turned away without saying anything, Geiger said.” (Statement of Thomas Geiger, from an interview, by Steve Schultze, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, March 16, 2005)
Following that interaction, Ratzmann left abruptly, went home and got his gun. He returned to the church and we know the rest of the story.
The above URL is an in-depth analysis of the case. Please review it for a better understanding of what occurred.
Ratzmann pulled the trigger and did all the killing, but the church certainly contributed to the outcome. Demons were not responsible as the church suggests, people were responsible.
Posted by: Larry J. Chavez on March 23, 2005 08:49 AM