Jeff Weise, the Minnesota high school student who went on a shooting rampage recently, provides us a window in the modern Nazi movement in America.

A group he followed, the "Libertarian National Socialist Green Party" supports racial balkanization, that is, allowing each racial and ethic group to live in it's own little enclave.

End all anti-discrimination laws in medicine, hiring, housing and government service. Each ethnocultural group will have its own space, its own laws and customs, and leaders. [source]

We do however support the right of nations, or local groups, to maintain racial standards for areas under their jurisdiction. Our membership and events are open to people of all races, ages, genders, sexual preferences, ethnicities, and origins, although we do actively discriminate against those so foolish to admit to believership in Judaism or Christianity....

With every race healthy and content on its native continent, this world has no need for the capitalist globalist culture which is slowly replacing everything we've learned over thousands of years with strip malls, cable television and Internet pr0n....

Among our members we proudly count many people of African heritage. Our view is that every race should accept the ancient ways of naturalism and animism and thus be racist against all other races; therefore while we freely support African nationalism and our African members, they and we recognize that the races must not be mixed and each culture must be allowed to be autonomous and independent from all others.

Compare this with Ward Churchill's views:

There’s no U.S. in America anymore. What’s on the map instead? Well let’s just start with territoralities often delineated in treaties of fact—territoralities of 500 indigenous nations imbued with an inalienable right to self-determination, definable territoralities which are jurisdictionally separate. Then you’ve got things like the internal diasporic population of African Americans in internal colonies that have been established by the imposition of labor patterns upon them. You’ve got Appalachian whites.

Remember: Leftists defend Churchill as one of their own.

From the Nazi above quote, I think you can easily see this group's hatred of Christians and Jews, as well as their hatred of capitalism. Modern Nazis think these things are part of National Socialism not because they know little about it, but rather because know much more about their beloved founder than the average misinformed American.

As Jeff Weise put it:

I guess I've always carried a natural admiration for Hitler and his ideals, and his courage to take on larger nations. I also have a natural dis-like for communism. When I was growing up, I was taught (like others) that Nazi's were (are) evil and that Hitler was a very evil man etc. Of course, not for a second did I believe this. Upon reading up on his actions, the ideals and issues the German Third Reich addressed, I began to see how much of a lie had been painted about them. They truly were doing it for the better.

And what else do modern Nazis support? Well, they're a deep shade of green:

The deep ecology movement restated what the NSDAP believed: that in order for humans to exist without destroying their environment, it had to be placed on equal footing with humans, recognizing in addition that its space requirements were greater as while humans are one species, nature is uncountable interlocked species, creating a codependent, eternal whole.

For this reason our goals regarding the environment are to decrease the human land-use footprint, decrease our use of resources and reprocess our waste so that we do not introduce it to the environment. These are simple goals with complex implications. [source]

Of course. They're simply following Hitler's own teachings on the subject. The following, from Mein Kampf, is about his views of eugenics, but note how be bases them in his own beliefs about Nature -- which he views as being against the JudeoChristian view:

Man’s effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict with those principles to which he himself exclusively owes his own existence. By acting against the laws of Nature he prepares the way that leads to his ruin.

Here we meet the insolent objection, which is Jewish in its inspiration and is typical of the modern pacifist. It says: "Man can control even Nature."

There are millions who repeat by rote that piece of Jewish babble and end up by imagining that somehow they themselves are the conquerors of Nature. And yet their only weapon is just a mere idea, and a very preposterous idea into the bargain; because if one accepted it, then it would be impossible even to imagine the existence of the world.

And:

.... a man must never fall into the madness of believing that he has really risen to be lord and master over Nature—which is so easily induced by the conceit of half-education—but must understand the fundamental necessity of Nature’s rule, and realize how much his existence is subject to these laws of eternal combat and upward struggle. Then he will sense that in a universe where planets revolve around suns, and moons turn about planets, where force alone forever masters weakness, compelling it to be an obedient servant or else crushing it, there can be no special laws for man.

And John Ray notes:

Here's a quote which may sound very familiar -- at least in part. "We recognise that separating humanity from nature, from the whole of life, leads to humankind's own destruction and to the death of nations. "Only through a re-integration of humanity into the whole of nature can our people be made stronger...

"This striving toward connectedness with the totality of life, with nature itself, a nature into which we are born, this is the deepest meaning and the true essence of National Socialist thought."

That was Ernst Lehmann, a leading biologist under the Nazi regime, in 1934, and he wasn't alone. Hitler, for one, was an avid vegetarian and green, addicted to homoepathic cures. His regime sponsored the creation of organic farming, and SS leader Heinrich Himmler even grew herbs on his own organic farm with which to treat his beloved troops.

Sounds very much like the modern left, no?

Nazis differ from communists (which Hitler called "Bolshevists") in that they were patriotic, and believed that groups of people (by ethnic group) had the right to self-determination. Communism, in contrast, was international. Yet both movements were socialist in every sense of the word.

It seems we're not hearing much about the killer's motivations in this case. During the 90s, in Jonesboro Arkansas, two boys -- one of whom had been active in his church choir at one time -- killed four people. The town became a media circus. We heard often about how one boy had attended church -- even though it was only the choir rehearsal (he liked the music) and even though he long since left and adopted a different lifestyle (an affinity for gansta rap).

Apparently, in this case, the media has little interest in reporting that a school killer was deeply into environmentalism and the Indian identity movement, extensive state control over natural resources, hated Christians, and believed that each ethnic group should be allowed to define its own standards and rules for how it should be treated.

Not something we need to let people know about.

For their own good, you understand.