Current Features

Gouverneur Morris
America: A Christian Nation?
Ya Gotta Have Faith!
Not-Hearing: Two Examples
The Paradox of Public Advertising
Cleave; Sanction
Doomsday Clock: False Authority Fallacy
Politicians and Their Children
Eric Boehlert Knows Inner Motives!
What is the Purpose of Democracy?
One Mess Created, Time to Create Another
Christians Pursuing Happiness

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Insignificant Thoughts
Insomnomaniac
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
The Right Scale
Sinking in Quixand


Downing Street Memos: Hoax?

Shades of Rathergate:

The eight memos — all labeled “secret” or “confidential” — were first obtained by British reporter Michael Smith, who has written about them in The Daily Telegraph and The Sunday Times.

Smith told AP he protected the identity of the source he had obtained the documents from by typing copies of them on plain paper and destroying the originals.

I've heard that one before; I wonder if he'll also claim he found them in a wastebasket?

I admit I'm caught off-guard by this development: I honestly hadn't expected another hoax from the media this month. I fear if I ratchet my media-distrust filter any higher to compensate, I'll end up like the moonbats on the left who think OBL was made up by the "Neocons" and filmed in a Hollywood studio.

Sadly, that kind of paranoia seems to be actually appropriate to contemporary mainstream media. I guess it's much easier to accumulate power if you're willing to just make things up on the way there. It certainly isn't a tactic most ordinary people typically expect.

If this keeps up, I'm going to have to change that "Media Bias" category to a more extreme-sounding "Media Lies" -- bias is subtle spin; what we've been seeing is nothing short of repeated wholesale fabrication.

Comments

Yes, you are tilting at windmills. Notice that Blair & Co. have not denied the accuracy of the documents.

Posted by: genius on June 30, 2005 01:28 AM

tim,

you seem to support fascists? are you german by chance?

Posted by: alex on July 21, 2005 08:49 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Can PBS Be Saved? | Front Page | Page Two | Lookin' Out My Back Door... »