|
Look, I understand college students will often try to drink each other into oblivion, and that's life. But for a corporate sponsor, one who wants us to think they care about "drinking responsible", to be promoting such behavior is despicable:
And they clearly think we're stupid:
Right. Which is why it's named "Perrier Pong". I have a huge reserve of affection for most beer companies, having spent most my life in beer towns (Milwaukee, St. Louis). But there's a vast difference between selling a product which can potentially be abused, and directly encouraging abuse as a way to move product. Who cares if young people get hurt? As long as we make a profit!!!
Go Bud Pong! Yay!!! Sure Budweiser wants you drink responsibly! And they also want you believe drinking games are played with... water! Boycott Budweiser. The fact that the event IS held in a bar shows that they are NOT trying to attract underage drinkers. Ummm... where did I say they were trying to attract underage drinkers?
So the game doesn't encourage underage drinking, and your evidence is that you and your underage friends play it... while drinking?
They're responsible because they don't drive. Except they do. But it's not very long. Because it's to the parking lot. To pick up their... cars...? And these admitted underage drinkers were at a... bar? Which is evidenced that this game wouldn't attract underage drinkers because it's promoted at ... bars?
Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on April 29, 2006 01:24 PM I don't think the company wants you to drink irresponsibly. Kids are just dumb and they drink and drive. It's not because they are soliciting to college students. People will play beer pong anyway. Posted by: Erin on December 12, 2006 01:48 AM I don't think the company wants you to drink irresponsibly. No, they just want you to drink as much as possible. It's a bit like Exxon with the Valdez oil spill: they didn't want to pollute the environment. They merely hated to reprimand a drunk sea captain. Dumping a ton of oil into the waters off Alaska was just a side effect, not the intended goal.
Gee: Tell Bud that. They don't seem to think so. If "people will do it anyway" then why are they promoting it? And if it doesn't lead to more drinking, then, again, ask yourself: Why are they promoting it? And if people will "play beer pong anyway" then why wasn't it popular even a decade or so ago? Or weren't you aware of that? Or do you imagine that beer companies' promotion of this "sport" has nothing to do with that? (And perhaps Las Vegas dollars have nothing to do with poker now showing up as a "sport" on ESPN -- despite it's being less of a "sport" than even a game of chess?)
Then, you have a kid -- surely a nice person, but just a bit trusting -- who is absolutely sure that it won't. Who would you bet on? I would bet the beer company is right.
But paying money to direct students towards drinking games is another matter altogether. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on December 12, 2006 05:07 AM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
This is stupid. Everyone is going to play Bei Rut anyways. The fact that the event IS held in a bar shows that they are NOT trying to attract underage drinkers. All of my underage friends and I play with water and drink on the side anyways because it is cleaner that way. The beer makes the table sticky and you don't have to have an extra ball cleaning cup on the side. Also, the vast majority of my friends are pretty responsible and will not drive after more than one or two beers, and even then, it's only the 45 second drive to the parking lot.
Posted by: Jeshua on April 28, 2006 10:48 AM