Current Features

Althouse Doesn't Get It
Orwellian Obama
Is the Castro-friendly Cuba policy working?
Women are cleverer than men, says research
Seaworld: "Dining With Shamu"
A World-Historic Find in Jerusalem
"Naïve"
Random Observations
Delayed Flights
Charlie Wilson's War, and the Utility of the CIA
Remembering Political Prisoners
Improving US History by Removing It

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Computers and Technology
Conspiracy Theories
Crime and Punishment
Dictatorships
Economics
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Genocide
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Honduras
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Libertarians
Life Skills
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Reality-Based News
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar/Amway Infiltrator
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Toynbee, Alsan, and Those Irresponsible Christians

Polly Toynbee, ranting in The Guardian about the many sins of Narnia:

Children are supposed to fall in love with the hypnotic Aslan, though he is not a character: he is pure, raw, awesome power. He is an emblem for everything an atheist objects to in religion. His divine presence is a way to avoid humans taking responsibility for everything here and now on earth... Without an Aslan, there is no one here but ourselves to suffer for our sins, no one to redeem us but ourselves: we are obliged to settle our own disputes and do what we can.

I hear this a lot from atheists: Since Christians believe in heaven, they don't believe in having humans take responsibility here on earth.

Yet, in my experience I find it is almost always inevitably atheists who are taking that kind of stand. For example, just a few days ago, I was reading through Sarah McLaughlin's lyrics, and was reminded that she seems to believe human beings are basicly innocent of all wrongdoing.

From her pop hit "Adia":

And there ain’t no one to buy our innocence
’cause we are born innocent
Believe me adia, we are still innocent
It’s easy, we all falter
Does it matter? ....

I take away your pain
And show you all the beauty you possess
If you’d only let yourself believe that
We are born innocent
Believe me adia, we are still innocent
It’s easy, we all falter, does it matter?
Believe me adia, we are still innocent
’cause we are born innocent
Adia we are still innocent
It’s easy, we all falter ... but does it matter?

So McLaughlin assures us, repeatedly, that we don't need a Jesus-like savior to "buy our innocence." All we really need to is realize that we're already wonderful and beautiful people, who are "born innocent", and are "still innocent" of all wrongdoing. And anything that does seem wrong is just "faltering", like the malfunctioning of a mindless machine, rather than a moral choice for which we are responsible. Furthermore, regarding our moral choices, "it doesn't matter" anyway.

Does that sound like a person who takes responsibility for the state of the world? Much less their own actions? Not unless you're smoking something!

So, is McLaughlin a Christian then? Heh, no, not in the slightest, she fits the modern definition of "atheist" quite well:

Dear God...
I feel that I should be hear loud and clear
We all need a big reduction
In the amount of tears
And all the people that you made in your image
See them fighting in the street
Cause they can't make opinions meet about God....

I won't believe in heaven and hell
no saints no sinners no devil as well
no pearly gate no thorny crown
you're always letting us humans down
the wars you bring....

If there's one thing I don't believe in
It's you, dear God.

So, um, what are we to make of this? How odd that Sarah is sure human beings do no wrong, but if there is wrong in the world, it must be the fault of God, or at least the idea of God.

Human beings: Innocent of everything wrong.
God: Guilty for everything wrong.

And indeed, even Polly Toynbee tips her own hand in her disjointed review. One minute, she complains that Christianity allows human beings to avoid responsibility for their own actions, yet another minute, she is complaining:

Poor child Edmund, to blame for everything, must bear the full weight of a guilt only Christians know how to inflict, with a twisted knife to the heart. Every one of those thorns, the nuns used to tell my mother, is hammered into Jesus's holy head every day that you don't eat your greens or say your prayers when you are told...

Now we might indeed complain that in some circles (Catholicism, in this case), guilt is overemphasized and overdone. Granted! But it's utterly illogical to place that complaint right next to claims that Christianity allows people to avoid responsibility for their own actions. I mean, which is it?

So what are we to learn from all this?

According to Sarah McLaughlin, who is clearly a skeptic, human beings are utterly innocent of doing wrong, even when we clearly see them do it. God, on the other hand, who we cannot see doing those things, is culpable for those actions, even if He told us not to do them.

And, according to Polly Toynbee, Christians are the ones encouraging people not to take any responsibility for their own actions and wrongdoing. Oh, except that they are also ones loading people up with guilt for their own actions and wrongdoing, which she clearly has an issue with.

Right. "Logic" like this is why I gave up on atheism a long time ago.

Comments

I've heard elsewhere that McLaughlin is some sort of neopagan/Wiccan type, rather than an outright atheist. So perhaps she's just another case of ABC Syndrome -- Anything But Christianity.

Posted by: Varenius on December 15, 2005 03:18 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Kyoto in the Cold | Front Page | Page Two | Angels in Pop Music »