|
Glenn Reynolds has an interesting post up in which he looks back on how deeply, deeply wrong most anti-war arguments were. My favorite excerpt:
We were endlessly lectured on how the French and Russian opposition to the war was an example of "moral" leadership. Yet it was easy enough to find out even then that both countries had struck billion- and even trillion-dollar oil deals with Saddam: they were willing to defend a guy who dropped whole families through plastic shredders if it meant a few more euros in their pockets. Disgusting! Glenn remarks: "Today's antiwar movement: tools of the international oil companies and arms traders. They used to say that kind of thing about war supporters, of course..." Throughout the cold war, through Vietnam, and even into the 1980s, the political left continually worked in a manner which "objectively" promoted the interests of totalitarian communist regimes. I guess, with those institutional slaughterhouses now shuttered, there's nobody better to serve than drug merchants, arms dealers, petty dictatorships, and big oil. I'm kidding of course: I don't think the left consciously serves any of these interests. But so many of their spokesmen work so well as "useful idiots." Go ahead: show me I'm overstating or unfair or wrong. I dare you. Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |