|
"Economics Nobel Laureate Gary Becker and Judge Richard Posner", via Jonathan Adler over at Volokh:
We'd like to think that if Joe is employed doing something for $6.00/hr, and we change the minimum wage to $12.00, that Joe will make twice as much. But, alas, life is not so simple. It pushes back at us. "Capital inputs" means that they might just decide to automate the supermarket checkout registers instead of paying more for checkers. Or perhaps instead of hiring Sam, who just got out of jail and is trying to get back on his feet, and will take $6/hour for a while to show he can be trusted -- the manager will hire Dave instead -- who is more qualified and worth about $12 an hour. Before, the owner didn't want to pay for the difference. Now -- why not? Same wage -- he can hire the apparently better-qualified worker and derive a bit of extra value, since he has to pay more anyway.
When McDonald's workers are paid a "living wage", you won't be buying many 99 cent cheeseburgers anymore. There goes McDonald's, and all the jobs it offers. Higher wages? No: fewer jobs.
Before, Business X employed five people. Now, they kept just the two most qualified ones, bought some equipment, and laid the other three off. Two people won the "living wage" lottery. Everyone else paid with their jobs. And prices are higher, so poorer customers are also harmed. "Hooray! We're helping the poor!" writes the press. Later, the increased numbers of poor will be noted. It will be claimed that we have not done enough, and even more harmful laws will be proposed. Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |