Current Features

What do Ron Paul and al Qaeda Have in Common?
Ignorance & Arrogance: The Dynamic Duo
Why Won't God Heal Amputees?
Who Supports Charities?
Mental Illness, Homelessness, and How Universities Make People Stupid
Ron Paul's Moral Equivalence
The Left is Wealthy - Who Knew?
Latest Embryonic Stem Cell Setback
Harris & Hitchens: Painting with a Broad Brush
US Foreign Policy, Mohammad Mossadeq, Ron Paul, and Iran
Pretty Feet at Any Cost
All We Are Saying...

Read the Front Page

Topics

Big Brother
Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Education
Entertainment
Europe
Everything You Know is Wrong
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Lou Dobbs' "Flexible" Relationship With Truth

In the course of addressing several ideas promoted by Ron Paul's official campaign website, I recently posted links to several articles which undermined the standard "NAFTA Superhighway" conspiracy theory, which Dr. Paul had been promoting.

Apparently, one of the big reasons people believe the most extreme parts of that theory, despite the apparent complete lack of supporting evidence, is that Lou Dobbs reported it on CNN. And, as we all know, if something appears on CNN, there's no possible way it could be wrong.

So imagine my complete lack of amazement when it turns out that Lou Dobbs is apparently an irresponsible nut-job, and even the New York Times has noticed.

“The invasion of illegal aliens is threatening the health of many Americans,” Mr. Dobbs said on his April 14, 2005, program. From there, he introduced his original report that mentioned leprosy, the flesh-destroying disease — technically known as Hansen’s disease — that has inspired fear for centuries.

According to a woman CNN identified as a medical lawyer named Dr. Madeleine Cosman, leprosy was on the march. As Ms. Romans, the CNN correspondent, relayed: “There were about 900 cases of leprosy for 40 years. There have been 7,000 in the past three years.”

“Incredible,” Mr. Dobbs replied.

Mr. Dobbs and Ms. Romans engaged in a nearly identical conversation a few weeks ago, when he was defending himself the night after the “60 Minutes” segment. “Suddenly, in the past three years, America has more than 7,000 cases of leprosy,” she said, again attributing the number to Ms. Cosman.

To make a long story short, that "three years" turns out to be thirty years, and and his respected "medical lawyer" was neither, but was, in fact, a dead white supremacist who accused Mexicans of being child molestors.

(One wonders how Lou came in contact with her writings.)

[Dobbs] has never acknowledged on the air that his program presented false information twice. Instead, he lambasted the officials from the [Southern Poverty Law Center] for saying he had. Even yesterday, he spent much of our conversation emphasizing that there really were 7,000 cases in the leprosy registry, the government’s 30-year database. Mr. Dobbs is trying to have it both ways.

He knows what he said originally, he knows "three years" was the wrong part, not the number 7,000, -- yet he refused to admit error or correct himself on air, insisting (deceptively) the number 7,000 was indeed correct.

I ask you, gentle reader, to consider what kind of regard for truth Lou Dobbs has. Whatever he was originally, this is not a man who is now honestly mistaken or misguided: Lou Dobbs is what we must be forced to call -- a term I try to use extremely rarely -- a liar.

Dobbs has also been pushing the same North American Union conspiracy theory that Ron Paul promotes. (They sound so similar, I wonder if one influenced the other.) And more recently, Lou has even suggested the current immigration bill is a first step towards creating the dreaded "NAU".

Now, I'm completely against the current immigration bill, but what Dobbs is saying isn't backed up by the evidence. The immigration bill is bad for quite a number of reasons, but that's simply not one of them. (And why criticise it for imaginary problems when it has so many real ones?)

These are strange, strange times, friends.

Comments

I do have to agree with that last part, Comrade.

So, just to add to the strangeness, I was looking at this woman and her legacy.

Here's her obit.

Notice the refrence to Tom Tancredo, who has been aligned with Mr. Paul on alot of issues.

Here you find out that she was a follower of Mrs. Rand, and had a penchant for exaageration:

link
link

Then, you can contrast the NY Times obituary for her.

Also, this issue of citing "experts" has been around on the news for a while, citing people like english professors as "terrorism experts." Or when the dilligent fact checking team over at CNN didn't catch a ticker that said that "Columbia was traveling at over 10 times the speed of light" during the coverage of the accident. So it doesn't surprise me at all that CNN would use a medieval studies professor turned activist as a "legitimate expert."

Unfortunately I think this is just a side effect of the sensationalism used to keep the publics attention driving the media. The real news is actually pretty boring. Hence the fauxtography and staged photographs, conspiracy theories, exaggerated reports and hyperbole.

Posted by: Michael Zappe on May 31, 2007 11:49 AM

In the previous post, Michael Zappe, our resident Media History Studies expert, commented:

Also, this issue of citing "experts" has been around on the news for a while, citing people like english professors as "terrorism experts."

A few neanderthals, of course, might question whether he has the proper credentials to make such a pronouncment. But according to experts (namely, he and I), he has a long and impressive track record of accurate predictions of this nature.

So it doesn't surprise me at all that CNN would use a medieval studies professor turned activist as a "legitimate expert."

Wasn't CNN per se so much as Lou Dobbs. Not that CNN didn't somewhat share in mistakes by not clarifying, but it wasn't their idea.

... she was a follower of Mrs. Rand...

Ayn is another person who said many large-scale things I agreed with, but who just went so far off the rails in certain areas.

Notice the refrence to Tom Tancredo, who has been aligned with Mr. Paul on alot of issues...

Although I sometimes differ with Tom Tancredo, I think he makes sense on a large number of issues as well. If I were in Congress, I'd probably myself tactically aligned with Dr. Paul in no small number of areas.

Unfortunately I think this is just a side effect of the sensationalism...

It sounds like the going theory on Lou Dobbs is that he himself doesn't buy most of what he peddles, but that he's doing it to suck up to a certain contingent.

The real news is actually pretty boring...

I disagree: the real news is often completely fascinating. For example here's an American Thinker article about the re-opening of a "racial-terror torture-murder" in Mississippi. That's somewhat interesting.

But it's even more interesting when you realize that the state's Democratic government "threw out all charges and released the suspects without further ado" -- and then sat on the case for several decades. Now that's really interesting, and would be quite a ratings-generator, given the man-bites-dog* aspect of the story.

(* To those who are used to thinking of the Democratic Party as, well, what the Republican Party actually usually was.)

But do you think that angle will see the light of day? Is it because there's no "sensationalist" angle? Or is it because -- contrary to what many of my friends typically insist -- leftism (as a religion) almost always tops greed and ratings?

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on May 31, 2007 10:11 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Ron Paul and Conspiracy Theories | Front Page | Page Two | Who Pays Gas Taxes? »