Current Features

Religious Freedom in Thailand
Pastor Wiley Drake Endorses Huckabee
Russian Facist Youth Movement?
Movies and Kiddos
Mike Huckabee's Tax Policies
Adding 2 + 2
Hamas Wedding Crashers
Christian Utopians
FISA Fakery
Kos's "Street Prophets"
Barry Bonds' "Hitting Machine"
Less Money Sent to Mexico?

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Computers and Technology
Crime and Punishment
Dicatorships
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar/Amway Infiltrator
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Pastor Wiley Drake Endorses Huckabee

EthicsDaily.com:

The religious liberty watchdog organization Americans United for the Separation of Church and State (AU) filed a complaint to the Internal Revenue Service on Aug. 14 charging that the Rev. Wiley Drake improperly used church letterhead to endorse a presidential candidate.

Drake, pastor of First Southern Baptist Church of Buena Park, Calif., and recent second vice president of the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote a press release on church letterhead endorsing former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee for president.

I don't agree with Drake's actions, but because I believe it's bad church policy, not because it should be illegal for religious people to say whatever they want from the pulpit.

“Federal tax law is clear,” stated the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, AU [Americans United for the Separation of Church and State] executive director. “Churches and other non-profits may not endorse candidates, if they want to keep their tax exemption. I am confident that the vast majority of Americans do not want to see their houses of worship politicized.”

I agree that all should be treated equally under the law, but I don't imagine, for a moment, that Barry W. Lynn actually cares about that -- nor actually cares about keeping churches from endorsing candidates.

Why would I say such a terrible thing?

Not because I want to think badly of "AU", but rather because they seem to be very concerned about some violations, and completely unconcerned about others -- like Obama's recent campaign speech at the UCC synod meeting, or churches that allowed Kerry to campaign from their pulpit on Sunday mornings during the last election.

We saw no AU complaints in those cases.

Comments

What always irks me is this idea that "seperating Church and State" means that the State can somehow punish the Church for its actions. This, to me, shows the real leftist agenda of placing the State above the Church. A true believer is seperation of Church and State would say that the the Pastor can print whatever he wants on Church letterhead, the State has no business telling him what should and shouldn't be Church policy, and that tax exemption is not something that can be arbitrarily given and taken away by the State, the State does in fact have no authority to tax the Church no matter the Church's actions.

Yet you never see this from any group who advocates this "wall of seperation". Their real agenda is a leftist utopia where what religion is tolerated is completely under the control of the State.

Posted by: on August 19, 2007 02:59 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Russian Facist Youth Movement? | Front Page | Page Two | Religious Freedom in Thailand »