Current Features

Groupies: It's *WRONG* to Asks Obama Any Hard Questions!
Free Markets Make Us Sick?
Expelled & Wikipedia
Being on the Left Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry
The Clintons: Soulless Enemies of All Things Decent
Democrats Oppose Columbian Trade Deal
Compassionate Libertarians?
The (Non)Development of Science in China
Reverse Hypocrisy
High gas prices are caused by greed!
Candian Crime Rates
Children: Under the Weather

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Computers and Technology
Conspiracy Theories
Crime and Punishment
Dictatorships
Economics
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Genocide
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Libertarians
Life Skills
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar/Amway Infiltrator
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Schwartzenegger Endorses McCain

Arnold ran as a Republican. California has a Democratic Senate. He proposed a "universal" healthcare insurance package which was apparently too lavish even for a group of Democratic Senators. Yes, that's correct: California's "Republican" Governor is effectively to the left of his Democratic opponents, some of whom are more concerned than he is about the cost.

"It doesn't matter if there are all these good things in the bill if there's not sufficient funding to pay for them," said Sen. Sheila Kuehl, the Santa Monica Democrat who chairs the committee.

California is $14 billion in the hole. "At the same time, Schwarzenegger issued proclamations declaring a fiscal emergency..." When you can't even keep the state running, you should be focused on trying to trim back unnecessary or wasteful programs, and upping your taxable income (by making the state business-friendly) before proposing lavish new ones.

Arnold is a big fan of McCain, apparently. McCain doesn't seem to understand economics either, from what I've seen. Yes, yes, he says he's in favor of (for example) the tax cut now, but I'm one of those people who watches what people do when nobody was looking and remembers it later. As he himself admitted, McCain voted against the tax cut before he was for it.

Do we need another temporary conservative?

Florida Republicans say "yes"!


Mark Steyn, ever pithy, feels likewise:

As for [McCain's] line about "some greedy people on Wall Street who need to be punished", aside from being almost entirely irrelevant to the subject under discussion (the subprime "crisis"), it reveals, I think, one of the most unpleasant aspects of McCain. For a so-called "maverick", he's very comfortable with the application of Big Government power, and the assumption of Big Government virtue. Undoubtedly there are "greedy people on Wall Street". Why should he and his chums be the ones who decide whether they need to be "punished"? If greed is to be punishable, why doesn't he start with a pilot program applied to, say, the United States Senate and report back to us in five years how that's going?

Government's job isn't to weigh the motives of people and punish bad thoughts. (That's God's job, actually.) But this kind of rhetoric is all too popular today, even, sadly, among the alleged conservative party.

Comments

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« The Unhinged Vote | Front Page | Page Two | A Plea to Conservatives: The Danger of Three »