|
Do you consider yourself politically conservative? Do you believe that policies can make the difference between lives being lost or saved, between a depression and a functioning economy, between liberties being protected or squandered on feel-good but harmful measures? Then please, get involved in the primaries, don't wait until a candidate you hate wins the nomination, and then sit out the final election. That does more harm than good. I'm in a bit of a precarious situation myself here, since it seems (I am told) registration for the primaries here in Colorado closes on February 5th, but that still gives me one or two days to see if I can make things right. I suppose I will also have to switch my party affiliation from "Independent" to (ugh!) "Republican" which, frankly, I will admit, still gives me a sense of loathing. I *do not* believe in the Republican party, and don't consider myself one, but I also can't be irresponsible enough to let a party which is far worse take over without some kind of opposition. Now a specific plea, which might not please some of my readers. Does McCain scare you? Does he scare you more than, say Mitt Romney? He scares me. Any conservative who needs evidence to this effect needs to consider the warnings of longtime, stalwart conservatives like Thomas Sowell, David Limbaugh, and many others. (And here's an interesting little gem from history, as well, showing McCain's devotion to the cause. I heard the rumors back then -- guess there was some substance.) In short, though I honor McCain as a war hero, and agree he's got a no-nonsense stance on defense, he's also got ZERO understanding of most other conservative principles. No, worse: he clearly has left-leaning reflexes, and, as one critic points out, is fond of viciously attacking conservatives with whom he disagrees. He clearly was anti-anti-illegal-immigration for his entire career (like Huckabee -- and similarly implied that all such opposition was bigoted) and now wants to convince us he holds the other stance. When the Bush tax cut was in trouble, he opposed it on class warfare grounds, but now lies about his stance regarding that. (More on McCains love of class warfare.) McCain's almost every impulse domestic policy issues is liberal, as is not hard to deduce from legislation like McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, etc. And he's just an angry, nasty person -- up-close and personal. Hey, and the media seems to love him, which should also give you pause. This is a perilous time for conservatives, as three main candidates remain: Huckabee, Romney, and McCain. I'm not exactly thrilled out of my mind about Romney, but he's run a clean, consistent campaign, and doesn't appear to be drawn into the liberal impulse to "look" or "feel" good in the eyes of elites, history, etc. He did reduce the size of Massachusetts' government, and doesn't seem to have been madly switching his views over the last several years (or months). In short, he scares me the least of the three. I also have great concerns about Huckabee. I started out as a Huckabee fan, but his numerous lies (his seminary degree, his switching support on illegal immigration), his rather nasty and underhanded (against Thompson, no less; another transcript here) campaign tactics, his apparent ignorance of the bible (only important for a person who claims to be biblically-based), and warnings from Arkansas conservatives have landed him, in my mind, is a similar category with John McCain (though not quite as a bad). He sounds good on paper at the moment, but if you watch the hips, not the shoulders, you intuit an entirely different center of gravity. Regardless of whether you agree with my analysis of Huckabee, or think he's the best thing since sliced bread, you only have to ask one question: Do you want John McCain to the next Republican candidate for President? Would you prefer him over Mitt Romney? If not, then you need to get serious. Three is a bad number, sometimes. When you have three candidates, bad things can happen -- you can often end up with the worst of the three winning because the "more popular" position gets split between two candidates, and their supporters are too "idealistic" to actually do good in the world -- they refuse to vote strategically, rather than "with their heart." And Huckabee is running a distant, not close, third. But substantial enough to be, in effect, McCain's greatest ally.
I'm no fan of Mark Levin. I find him whiney, annoying and disrespectful to opponents. Like Mike Savage and Ann Coulter, I often wish he wasn't "on my team", so to speak. But I'm willing to hold my nose and say he's absolutely right when he makes this case:
I agree entirely. Read the whole thing. Regardless, even if you disagree with me, get out there and vote in the primaries, or at least try, as I now realize I must -- quickly. If you don't like Republican Presidential candidates, get involved earlier -- don't stay home and let someone you really dislike take office and shape our nation in ways you won't like. Best to you, friends. He's the one that raises people up, and strikes them down, so it's good to not get bent too out of shape. Not about the results. But we're accountable for our efforts and approach. I always think: "I'm responsible for my intentions and actions, God's responsible for the results." That resolves a lot of moral conundrums. (By "the results", I mean unforseeable results (from my POV). If knew something had a 50/50 or 90/10 chance of happening, it was incumbent upon me to consider that.)
As I watched, this horn was waging war against the saints and defeating them, until the Ancient of Days came and pronounced judgment in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came when they possessed the kingdom. (Daniel 7:21-22) The fact there's a "war" means that "the saints" are fighting back. But they're going down fighting, whether they have the advantage or not. It's not important that we win, just that we act honestly, and do what we can as best we can understand it, and be open to criticism. Bless you. Oh, and thanks for the correction: I'd written "January" when the correct answer was "February". (Corrected.) So I hope my typo didn't deter anyone from doing what they could. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on February 3, 2008 04:27 PM I have information (gathered as a mole in the Paultard camp) on how the caucus works, etc. If you'd like, I can forward it to you, or post it here. Post it here please! Thank you!
Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on February 3, 2008 04:44 PM Well, to get started, here's a nice little site to help you find your county clerk. If you haven't changed affiliation yet, you may need to get your registration activated by the county clerk in order to participate in the primary: http://www.elections.colorado.gov/DDefault.aspx?tid=147 The ones at the Jefferson County Building (off 6th Avenue. Here's the map) are actually really nice folks and will be glad to help. They have an information desk on the second or third and can help you. Here is the Colorado Republican Party precinct information page. Posted by: Michael Zappe on February 3, 2008 10:36 PM Well, my intelligence among the folowers of Ron Paul Marot has coniststed for the most part I've lied low just gathering information. (Mostly because I'm too lazy to hit the 'unsubscribe' link.) For the most part it's a very disconnected group of people who latch on to him because he's nebulous enough to absorb whichever theory of what government liberty means. (Anarchism, gold standard, alien conspiracies, race wars, Bildebergers, whatever.) The machine is also pretty resilient to attack as well. As we saw in one of my earlier posts, people can warp their mind into believing that Ron Paul is their political Messiah despite evidence to the contrary. Overall, I came up with the new nickname for him after reading the Guillotine and the Cross by Warren Carroll. He had a great summary of how people touted "Liberté!" at every opportunity during the French Revolution, while cutting peoples heads off for not having their papers in order. Ron Paul has a faint echo of that with his strange nebulous definitions of liberty, and relatively fanatical followers, who don't seem to care about real liberty so much as their pet cause. Posted by: Michael Zappe on February 3, 2008 10:52 PM Argh, I goofed up my own clever slur: Ron Paul Marat! Posted by: Michael Zappe on February 4, 2008 12:39 AM The machine is also pretty resilient to attack as well... Sad but true: Followers' inability to confront contrary evidence is actually a political asset in some ways. At least regarding things nasty, brutish, and short-lived. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on February 4, 2008 11:41 AM Well, sigh. They won't let you vote unless you switched your party almost a month or more ago. Ack. A commenter over at Anchoress remarks: Also, I don’t think John McCain will have a chance against Barak Obama’s youth and vigor. At least Mitt Romney is a “change” and fresh face to compete with him. I think that's right. Ignoring the issues, voters are going to see a respectable but grumpy old man and a young, fresh face. And Republicans do not do well when they run as Democrats-lite on major issues. Iraq will hopefully be a not-so-hot issue then, and I don't see what that's going to leave McCain's selling point as being. Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on February 4, 2008 11:14 PM Yeah, unfortunately I thought the January deadline you originally posted was correct. However, I will be going, partly through inspiration from you, and make sure to vote against the greater evils. Posted by: Michael Zappe on February 5, 2008 01:34 AM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
I'm in a bit of a precarious situation myself here, since it seems (I am told) registration for the primaries here in Colorado closes on January 5th, but that still gives me one or two days to see if I can make things right. I suppose I will also have to switch my party affiliation from "Independent" to (ugh!) "Republican" which, frankly, I will admit, still gives me a sense of loathing. I *do not* believe in the Republican party, and don't consider myself one, but I also can't be irresponsible enough to let a party which is far worse take over without some kind of opposition.
Don't feel too bad, I had to do much the same, Tim. However, January 5th has long passed. :-( The caucus is on Tuesday. I have information (gathered as a mole in the Paultard camp) on how the caucus works, etc. If you'd like, I can forward it to you, or post it here.
And, yes, as I hold my nose, I'll be voting for Romney.
It's also good to remember, as I have to remind myself quite often that all of this is in the hands of God. He's the one that raises people up, and strikes them down, so it's good to not get bent too out of shape.
Though with who he's raising up, perhaps Rev 18:4 is going to be quite a relevant passage in the not-so-distant future.
Posted by: Michael Zappe on February 3, 2008 04:04 PM