Current Features

Life Skills 101: Reason
Famous Dave Makes A Splash
The Big Bang: Another Incompatibility Between Science and Religion
Fidel Castro's Cuba: 100% Literacy!
Face Time
How Many Genes Do We Have?
60 Minutes: Denmark! The Happiest Nation on Earth?
Unity versus Democracy
Dialoging with the Left's Supporters
UK Supports Polygamy
Journalistic Objectivity
Antizionism and Antisemitism

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Computers and Technology
Conspiracy Theories
Crime and Punishment
Dicatorships
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Life Skills
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar/Amway Infiltrator
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


The Big Bang: Another Incompatibility Between Science and Religion

What Western scientist first hypothesized the "Big Bang"? Go ahead and look at the Wikipedia article on the subject -- you won't find the answer there. (Heck, I just found out myself.)

Georges LeMaitre (1894-1966) showed that religion and science -- or at least physics -- did not have to be incompatible. LeMaitre, born in Belgium, was a monsignor in the Catholic church.

He was fascinated by physics and studied Einstein's laws of gravitation, published in 1915. He deduced that if Einstein's theory were true (and there had been good evidence for it since 1919), it meant the universe must be expanding. In 1927, the year he got his PhD from MIT, LeMaitre proposed this theory, in which he stated that the expanding universe was the same in all directions -- the same laws applied, and its composition was the same -- but it was not static. He had no data to prove this, so many scientists ignored it. (Another scientist, Soviet Aleksandr Friedmann, had come to the same conclusion independently, a few years earlier.) Even Einstein was reluctant to endorse this extension of his theory of general relativity. [1]

As mentioned previously, Einstein was busy fiddling with the "cosmological constant" because he was appalled at the idea the universe might have had a beginning. The very idea provoked similar disgust throughout the scientific community, who opposed it vigorously.

That same year [LeMaitre] talked with Einstein in Brussels, but the latter, unimpressed, said, “Your calculations are correct, but your grasp of physics is abominable.” It was Einstein’s own grasp of physics, however, that soon came under fire. In 1929 Edwin Hubble’s systematic observations of other galaxies confirmed the red shift....

Most scientists who read Lemaitre’s paper accepted that the universe was expanding, at least in the present era, but they resisted the implication that the universe had a beginning. They were used to the idea that time had gone on forever... Eddington himself wrote in the English journal Nature that the notion of a beginning of the world was “repugnant.” ....

After Arthur Eddington died in 1944, Cambridge University became a center of opposition to Lemaitre’s theory of the Big Bang. In fact, it was Fred Hoyle, an astronomer at Cambridge, who sarcastically coined the term “Big Bang.” Hoyle and others favored an approach to the history of the universe known as the “Steady State” in which hydrogen atoms were continuously created and gradually coalesced into gas clouds, which then formed stars. [2]

Einstein eventually came to respect LeMaitre's work, and Cambridge finally gave in after Penzias and Wilson discovered the "ringing sound" left by the shock of the universe's first day.

It's true that sometimes religion and science are in conflict. What most people don't remember is that atheism and materialism are also religions which sometimes attract dogmatic and inflexible followers.

Comments

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Fidel Castro's Cuba: 100% Literacy! | Front Page | Page Two | Famous Dave Makes A Splash »