Speaking Out?
Politics
| August 4, 2008
| Tim
Consider the following paragraph. When and where was it written?
I know I should be speaking out when I hear statements such as these, but the sad fact is that I like these people. Barring their monomaniacal animosity towards Jews, they're otherwise very nice: they're hard workers, loving parents, good neighbors and helpful and reliable friends. Being the social creature that I am, I don't want with one word ("Jew") to turn these friendships upside down and inside out. (I'm not the only one with this problem.) I don't want to be on the receiving end of a hideous Jekyll to Hyde transformation, so I just keep my mouth shut.
Sorry, I cheated. I admit it.
The paragraph is from an anonymous woman located in Marin County, California. As I was reading her complaint about having to be a crypto-Republican, something in my brain said: "I wonder if this was a little bit it was like to be a Jew in before WWII in Europe." I wanted to see what it looked like if I'd change the prejudice, and substitute in another term.
Perhaps that's a bad move -- I'm not an alarmist, and I honestly don't expect an anti-Republican holocaust. (Solidly liberal enclaves are few and far between.) I also don't want to trivialize the holocaust by comparing it to something far less drastic. But still - isn't it the same mechanism, even if in a dilute, milder form? Having to hide one's identity to avoid complete social ostracism? Utter intolerance of difference?
Isn't this the same sort of thing the Armenian Christians thought about Turkish neighbors? Is this the same thing Maimonides thought while trying to pass himself and his family off as Muslims? What Jews in many times and places thought about antisemites? What certain Catholics might have felt from Protestants in US history? (Or vise-versa in Europe?) Do New York Liberals feel this same way in the deep south, or is there an asymmetry (as I would suspect)? Do liberals anywhere legitimately worry about having their paint job keyed for having a bumper sticker the same way conservatives do in many places?
Those people I know who have spoken aloud their new conservative political views have been horrified by the animosity turned against them by formerly friendly neighbors and colleagues. My in-laws who are, like me, 9/11 neocons (down in Los Angeles) have stared open-mouthed at colleagues who use staff meetings to revile Bush and the Republicans - all to the cheers and huzzahs of the other staff members. (Indeed, what they describe sounds remarkably like Orwell's Two Minutes Hate.) On the occasions when they've suggested that maybe, just maybe, Bush isn't the Antichrist, they've found themselves shunned by these same colleagues.
I understand: In many places I've worked, I'm one of the few conservatives, and have often felt that my more "liberal" colleagues would not take my repudiation of their views and beliefs anywhere near as lightly as I take their frequently injecting (half-baked) political talking points into business meetings. Sometimes I'd like to respond, but I know management would prefer we not inject politics (nor religion) into work.
What's your take? Anything you hide out of a legitimate fear of ostracism?
Of course it's the same mechanism - don't apologize for pointing it out.
Although I'm on the other side of the half-century mark in age, I know that the "good old days" were not always good. We have made progress in some areas. I suspect that those crying loudest about our racist society never travelled, as I did, through the pre-civil-rights South. (And racial prejudice wasn't much better in the North, just more subtle.) We've come a long way. And no one who flew on an airplane before the smoking ban can deny that in some ways our society has become much more civilized.
Be that as it may -- our society is a mess, and in many crucial ways we have lost even the veneer of civilization. For true horror, who needs to pay money for a Stephen King novel? I miss the days when a newspaper's letters to the editor went through a screening process. Now that most papers have online editions, we're lucky if they screen out basic profanity. Pick a news story with any element of controversy, and check out the readers' comments if you dare. Blogs, blog comments, YouTube videos and their comments -- I don't even need to venture into anything remotely sleazy to find people saying terrifying things about other people. The style, grammar, and spelling exhibited would be horrifying enough to anyone who pays school taxes, but I'm talking about virulent anger, hatred, and appalling ignorance.
My observation has been than most of this rude and frightening behavior comes from self-styled liberals, those who would label themselves Left rather than Right, and those most likely to vote Democratic. This may be from a basic "design flaw" -- that is, those political and moral attitudes may predispose one to uncivilized behavior. On the other hand, there are certainly enclaves where the disgusting behavior is coming from those with opposite political leanings. I think it's proportionately much, much smaller, but that may have more to do with the Left being disproportionately represented in the worlds of culture, art, education, and the news media.
Based on my own experiences, I've found that conservatives are much more likely to hedge their views with "in my experience," or "this is what works for me," or "I understand where you are coming from," while liberals tend to be dogmatic and think those who disagree really are stupid and evil. But I fear my liberal things may see the situation differently....
I don't hide out, but I most definitely tailor my conversation to my audience. You don't tease a rabid dog. :)
Although I've noticed a bit of rude and obscene behavior from those on "the right" as well, I have to agree with your overall assessment, "Sursum Corda." Things are definitely getting crude. And mean. For example, almost-candidate Mike Gravel was just in the news for telling people to track down and threaten a Federal prosecutor's children. (He brought charges against a Palestinian jihadist.) Nasty!
Since I believe that liberty is, at the end of the day, only a strong as the idea in peoples' minds, and that people of low character and morals can't maintain freedom, I am, of course, concerned where this is all going.
...while liberals tend to be dogmatic and think those who disagree really are stupid and evil.
I've seen that too. Strangely, I'm actually a bit of an exception to the rule: I don't think most liberals are simply misguided or mistaken. I tend to think they're actually guilty of the "evil" they tend to project onto conservatives.
Yet the reason I don't especially demonize them is that I realize I could easily have been in the same shoes, and that the "evil" I attribute to them is just the evil which is, sadly, all too common among mankind.
A pleasure talking to you, as always. Best to you!
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.
« Snow Down Under? |
Front Page |
Page Two
| Notes from Today »
|
Of course it's the same mechanism - don't apologize for pointing it out.
Although I'm on the other side of the half-century mark in age, I know that the "good old days" were not always good. We have made progress in some areas. I suspect that those crying loudest about our racist society never travelled, as I did, through the pre-civil-rights South. (And racial prejudice wasn't much better in the North, just more subtle.) We've come a long way. And no one who flew on an airplane before the smoking ban can deny that in some ways our society has become much more civilized.
Be that as it may -- our society is a mess, and in many crucial ways we have lost even the veneer of civilization. For true horror, who needs to pay money for a Stephen King novel? I miss the days when a newspaper's letters to the editor went through a screening process. Now that most papers have online editions, we're lucky if they screen out basic profanity. Pick a news story with any element of controversy, and check out the readers' comments if you dare. Blogs, blog comments, YouTube videos and their comments -- I don't even need to venture into anything remotely sleazy to find people saying terrifying things about other people. The style, grammar, and spelling exhibited would be horrifying enough to anyone who pays school taxes, but I'm talking about virulent anger, hatred, and appalling ignorance.
My observation has been than most of this rude and frightening behavior comes from self-styled liberals, those who would label themselves Left rather than Right, and those most likely to vote Democratic. This may be from a basic "design flaw" -- that is, those political and moral attitudes may predispose one to uncivilized behavior. On the other hand, there are certainly enclaves where the disgusting behavior is coming from those with opposite political leanings. I think it's proportionately much, much smaller, but that may have more to do with the Left being disproportionately represented in the worlds of culture, art, education, and the news media.
Based on my own experiences, I've found that conservatives are much more likely to hedge their views with "in my experience," or "this is what works for me," or "I understand where you are coming from," while liberals tend to be dogmatic and think those who disagree really are stupid and evil. But I fear my liberal things may see the situation differently....
I don't hide out, but I most definitely tailor my conversation to my audience. You don't tease a rabid dog. :)
Posted by: SursumCorda on August 5, 2008 09:17 AM