Current Features

Fake "Zen" Proverbs
LA NOW: First Tammy Bruce, and Now.... This???
Smearing Bob Schaffer
Liveblogging the Liveblogging the Veep Debate
USA For Sale
Debunking the CRA Argument?
Rabbit-Proof Fence and The Deer Hunter: Story versus Context
Causes of the Current Crisis?
My Political Coke vs Pepsi Taste Test
Sam Harris: In Praise of Elitism
The Lipstick and Pig Imbroglio
Anthony Flew on Richard Dawkins

Read the Front Page

Topics

Blogging
Computers and Technology
Conspiracy Theories
Crime and Punishment
Dictatorships
Economics
Education
Election 2008
Entertainment
Europe
Faith and Philosophy
Faith and Politics
Features
France
Fun
General
Genocide
Happy Stuff
Health
History
Human Rights
Humor
International
Iraq
Left Versus Right
Libertarians
Life Skills
Media Bias
Personal Notes
Politics
Product Reviews
Quick Alerts
Quixtar
Racism
Reality-Based News
Ron Paul
Science
Science Fiction
Sexuality
Sick & Wrong Department
Society
The Arab Street
The Arts
The Church of Gaia
Travel
Words, Words, Words
Your Money

Archives

October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

Search


The Blogosphere

BitsBlog
Beyond the Rim
Common Sense and Wonder
Dissecting Leftism
Drive-Thru Musings
FunMurphys.com
Investor Blogger
Iowa Geek
La Shawn Barber
The Littlest Apologist
Mark D. Roberts
Muddling Towards Maturity
Quixtar/Amway Infiltrator
Quixtar Blog
Quixtar Sucks
Sinking in Quixand
Zappe Family Blog


Aboriginal Sexism: No Didgeridoo for Girls

Via The Global Sociology Blog, yet another example of multiculturalism gone wild:

The Australian version of the Daring Book for Girls is due to be published next month. It has angered some indigenous leaders who view the didgeridoo as a male instrument not to be played by women. Publisher Harper Collins Australia said it was not aware of any taboos on women playing the didgeridoo, and has apologised for any offence caused.

"SocProf" complains:

Oh please. Give me a break. Because heaven [forbid] that in the 21st century, girls get to play a specific musical instrument. So, here again, traditions are used to justify gender discrimination and who gets to apologize? The discriminators? Nope, rather those mildly promoting gender equality.

SocProf also points out a nice bit of contemporary hypocrisy:

... after all, in Taliban culture, there is “men’s business” and “women’s business” as well, no? It’s also an argument made by fundamentalist of all tripes, like the Christianists. Would we accept such a normative attitude from them?

Quite right! Just as vegans don't really believe people are just animals (or they wouldn't demand a completely different standard for our diet) so also many alleged "multiculturalists" don't really believe all cultures are equal, or they'd accept the same standards from each. Instead, the appearance seems to be that they simply use other societies as a means of attacking that which they hate within their own.

For example, SocProf has picked up (undoubtedly from the peers he is now chastising) the nice little insult "Christianist" -- a not-so-subtle attempt to imply a Christian equivalent of the program to spread political Islam by violence, despite the clear lack of any evidence of an equivalent. (If a Christian peacefully campaigns to democratically enact, say, a law protecting unborn children, well, they're a scary "Christianist"!)

He or she clearly shares that specific prejudice, but seems confused by the apparent disconnect: Why not be concerned about the same negative behaviors in other cultures? Because its not really about that behavior, actually. ;-) Sexism is fine in most the world, and even among our peers (c/f Palin) -- but it's a very handy bludgeon, should we need it, for our enemies.

The, um, "Christianists."

(Who are now excited about a female moose hunter and political leader -- who they would apparently prefer to have running the whole country.)

Comments

Imran! (More greetings on the next post!)

Re Vegans: Indeed! From what I know, you're dead right, about brain size. (They think fish consumption, with lots of omega-3 acids, may have played a very significant role in that.)

Another tidbit: People looking at the human form have always been a bit confused. If we're "supposed" to be meat eaters, then how come we don't have a short intestinal tract (which I guess aided the processing of soon-to-rot meat), like carnivores?

Like here: Carnivorous animals have intestinal tracts that are 3-6x their body length, while herbivores have intestinal tracts 10-12x their body length. Human beings have the same intestinal tract ratio as herbivores.

It turns out that by cooking meat, early humans essentially "pre-digested" their food before eating it, making it easier to liberate the excess calories required for intelligent thought. (Other animal's brains use a very small percentage of their energy, humans, it's about 30% or so, if I recall correctly.)

I remember when we'd make the "Quixtar on an island" analogy: Vegans on an island, heh. You're right though.

Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on September 7, 2008 08:57 AM

If we leave vegans in a wild island, few centuries down the road their brains would be reduced to the size of a monkey's brain and Lions will be feasting on them.

Vegan diets are easy to do incorrectly. I agree that people are not naturally vegan and that early tribes would have been foolish to go that route. While I think a high fish diet (without red meat or pork) is optimal, from the standpoint of nutrition, it's possible to be vegan and very healthy with a variety of workarounds (which many vegans neglect.) Nutritional yeast is used as a Vitamin B12 supplement. Veggies can be blended and strained to provide large amounts of nutrients that are without bulk and easily digested. Seaweed extracts serve as an EPA source. (since, in a traditional diet, oceangoing fish would eat seaweed and concentrate the DHA and EPA.) Extracting nutrients from food is not a problem in the modern age when we have blenders, stoves, and even genetic engineering to aid us. My programming skills wouldn't be of much use on a desert island either, but I don't think that devalues them. We adapt to our environment, whatever that may be. Grazing cattle on pastureland makes sense. But there are a lot of problems with factory farmed food, on a personal health(lower levels of certain nutrients) and societal level. Not to mention, for some, a moral level.

Veganism is a lot more work than most people are willing to do. And yes, it does tend to select for unusual people.

People looking at the human form have always been a bit confused.

Interesting! Yes, I'd been confused in exactly that way. We seemed like hunters with eyes squarely on the fronts of our heads, but we had the teeth and digestive tracts of herbivores. Thanks. That makes sense.

Posted by: Ryan W. on September 7, 2008 12:23 PM

If we're "supposed" to be meat eaters, then how come we don't have a short intestinal tract (which I guess aided the processing of soon-to-rot meat), like carnivores?

I reread this just now. I think the longer digestive tract is required for digesting plant matter, especially cellulose, which humans lack the microbes to digest, as well as absorbing the nutrients produced by guy bacteria. I've been told the microbes for digesting cellulose would give us diarrhea. Digesting the cellulose in plant matter is hard. Digesting meat is easy, provided you can get a bite of it. The whole mad cow thing started, for instance, because cows were being fed to other cows. If it weren't for the spread of disease, cows seem perfectly capable of digesting meat.

Cows can eat what people eat. People cannot survive on what cows eat.

Cellulose is very hard to digest. That's why I think rabbits, for instance, eat their poop. It essentially doubles the length of their digestive tract. The nutrients from meat are almost totally extracted in one run-through, unlike the nutrients from plants. Also, in regards to your recent post on B12 deficiency in vegans;

(9) Vitamin B12 is produced in the human intestine by some of the bacteria naturally present. A study in the 1950's verified that vegans with pernicious anaemia could be returned to normality by isolating the B12 analogues from their faeces and feeding them back orally, where it could be combined with intrinsic factor. This proved that the forms produced in the intestines contain active B12 analogues, but that insufficient(sic) is absorbed passively to prevent deficiency. ... Additionally many “herbivores” eat insects and faeces. link

Humans are pretty clearly designed to eat at least some fruit. We're descended from a subsection of primate that can't even produce its own vitamin C, a rarity in the animal world particular to a few animals that eat lots of fruit. Plenty of vitamin C can also be obtained by green vegetables. Granted, raw meat has a little vitamin C in it, but the nutrient is apparently destroyed or removed by cooking. (There's a lack of good information on this, surprisingly. )

Posted by: Ryan W. on September 14, 2008 07:07 PM

Greg - Granted, you can get all the essential amino acids through vegetables. But noone here suggested otherwise. Essential fatty acids are not the same as essential amino acids. You might want to address the points that people have brought up, which includes essential fatty acid consumption and B12 consumption (not essential amino acid consumption.)

Yes you can get B12 from nutritional yeast or supplements, but not everyone does and some nutritional yeasts, kept out in sunlight, lose their B12 and some people don't supplement at all.

Also, while the alpha linoleic acid from flax seed or hemp is converted (in very small quantities) into EPA it is still debated whether a person can get enough EPA that way to satisfy optimal dietary requirements (assuming, for the moment, that carniveroius EPA requirements are the same as vegetarian EPA requirements. It could be argued that vegan diets are less inflammatory and thus may require less EPA.) Carniverous diets fufill their EPA requirement primarily via fish consumption and secondarily by conversion from Alpha Linoleic Acid to other unsaturated fatty acids.
Personally, I get my EPA directly from seaweed extracts just to be on the safe side.

Vegans get enough EPA from ALA to prevent deficiency, but it's reasonable to question whether their levels are optimal. The jury seems to still be out here.

Vegetarian, especially vegan, diets are relatively low in alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) compared with linoleic acid (LA) and provide little, if any, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Clinical studies suggest that tissue levels of long-chain n-3 fatty acids are depressed in vegetarians, particularly in vegans.
Conversion of ALA by the body to the more active longer-chain metabolites is inefficient:
link
There's one recent (imprecise) study, however, which attempts to support the view that Alpha Linoleic Acid (found in hemp seed and flax, among other foods) is a good supplement for raising other poly unsaturated fatty acids, since its conversion to those fatty acids may be higher than expected. I think that this is what the pro-hemp crowd was aiming at, though you referred to essential amino acids rather than essential fatty acids.


The ratio of circulating long chain n-3 PUFA (LCn-3PUFA are the total of EPA, DPA and DHA) to dietary intake of ALA was calculated (PLCn-3PUFA:DALA)....



Discussion: Although these are epidemiological findings and not the result of careful metabolic studies, the fact that the PLCn-3PUFA:DALA(dietary alpha-linoleic acid) ratio is approximately 22% is(sic) higher in vegetarians and meat-eaters than in fish-eaters indicates that there is greater conversion of ALA than in fish-eaters and may explain the smaller than expected differences in n-3 PUFA(n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid) status between fish and non-fish consumers. Conclusions: If this finding were replicated in a controlled feeding study and it were confirmed that maintenance of n-3 PUFA status was feasible from plant sources there could be implications for the requirements for fish intake.

In either case, the low levels of EPA in the tissues of most vegans seem to support the point that many vegans get sub-optimal levels of certain unsaturated fatty acids. Even if it's easy to eat a good vegan diet, it seems clear that many vegans don't do so. (but the modern carnivorous diet has a tremendous number of problems too, of course.)

Posted by: Ryan W. on October 12, 2008 02:33 PM

I didn't include the source for the second citation.

second link

Also, the two cites shouldn't have been nested as they are. I was too lazy to preview, and the site interpreted my markup weirdly.

Posted by: Ryan W. on October 12, 2008 02:47 PM

Incidentally, flax is a better source of Alpha Linoleic acid than hemp, since Alpha Linoleic Acid and Linoleic acid compete for the same enzymes and people already get too much Linoleic acid in their diet relative to Alpha Linoleic acid. The ratios of the two are important, and most people get much more LA than ALA.

link

So relying on hemp for your ALA may actually impede the conversion of what ALA you do get into the other essential fatty acids (EPA and DHA particuarly.) Flax is a better source of EFAs if you're vegan. Just make sure it doesn't go rancid, as the expressed oil very quickly does.

Posted by: Ryan W. on October 12, 2008 03:03 PM

Add your two cents...

The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.

















« Prayer as Attempted Murder? | Front Page | Page Two | A Woman's Body is Her, Umm... What??? »