|
When I want real wisdom about the world, I turn to Hollywood. Actors are renowned their wisdom and political understanding. Take it away, Matt Damon...
Wow! Matt Damon, actuary and statistician -- who knew?
(That's where all the real foreign policy experts hang out: film festivals.)
Absurd? I thought "absurd" was responding to the invasion of a free nation by asking the invaders to "show restraint." I thought "absurd" was suggesting that Russia would vote "yes" on a UN resolution to condemn itself. I though Obama's view that Afghanistan is of far more strategic importance than Iraq was absurd. Compared to that, I suspect the woman who checked me out of the supermarket tonight would probably have more sensible responses. He's floored by her alleged inexperience, yet he doesn't seem to notice he's supporting a candidate for President whose only claim to executive experience before running was... Community organizer? (And the same amount of time as a Senator as Palin had as governor.) You've got to be kidding me. Absurd? That's surreal.
It boggles my mind. Every point he could make about Palin's inexperience -- as VP -- applies (and often moreso) to his own Presidential candidate. I'm amazed he can't see that. It would be nice if someone would confront him with that answer, but living in Hollywood means you never have to answer or think about hard questions.
Memo to Matt Damon: This is a political race, so, yes, everyone will be making political decisions. (Boy, can't put anything past him, can we?) Yes, McCain's choice was political. So was Obama's pick of Biden. So was Reagan's choice of GHW Bush. So was Mondale's choice of Ferraro. This is what presidential candidates do in races -- they make political choices. But, by all means, please feel free to inform us of any new revelations which pop into your gigantic brain. (Next thing you know, he'll also allege that she doesn't write all her own speeches! Or has been known to read from a thing called a "teleprompter"!)
I see Matt Damon hasn't bothered to do any research into these issues yet. He seems to think he seems to think that if a person shares his views on "creation" or "evolution" that's a sure-fire indicator they'll be a good politician. To the contrary, the secular have, by in large, on the wrong side of almost every major political issue I can think of in my lifetime: abortion, the tremendous evils of Communism, the threat posed by Islam, even the utility of adult stem cells. By Matt Damon's litmus test, Dukakis would have been a genius at foreign policy, and Ronald Reagan would have been an ignoramus. Of course, that was what Hollywood was saying at the time. Must be nice to live in a world where you never have to learn from the past. Would you believe he actually quoted a satirical article in the rest of his rant? He said he was concerned that she believed that the dinosaurs only lived 4,000 years ago -- this came from a comedy sketch, not a speech. Posted by: Harry on September 12, 2008 09:32 AM If we use the 2003 United States Life Tables for white males, the appropriate figures are: McCain's skin cancer history would tend to increase the percentage. The fact that he is clearly in more robust health than the average 72 year old white male and that he receives the best medical advice and treatment available tend to reduce the percentage. Posted by: tom sturm on October 1, 2008 02:56 AM Thanks for the statistics, Tom! If so, then apparently Matt Damon isn't skilled at simple algebra either, as 14% is a long way from "one out of three." Skin cancer isn't usually serious if one detects it early. Which would seem rather likely, as McCain does have, as you've mentioned, access to extremely high-quality healthcare. Let's just say, for fun, that his fitness and access to healthcare only confer a 2% benefit. If so, that implies a 12.4% chance of mortality. Which means, effectively, if we elected eight men with a profile similar to McCain, we should expect one to die in office. If we presume the average death point would be near mid-term, and multiply out all the years that implies, we come up with an expectation of 30 years of McCain-like time in office, and 2 years of the VP serving -- or an average expected VP time in office of 3 months, scaling that down to a single elected term of 4 years. Whereas as if elect Obama, the odds of having someone with even less executive experience than Sarah Palin in the Oval Office for four years will be almost precisely... 100% Posted by: Tim (Random Observations) on October 2, 2008 10:43 AM Of course, I'm not very politically savvy, but two things: First, I can't help but think that a lot of the rabid criticism of Palin stems from the fact that she's not just a woman (if she was a man, would she be getting this kind of flack from both genders?), but a woman who - OH MY GOD! - might actually be a genuine political opponent and not merely a silent partner chosen to attract the "women's vote". Not to mention that she's not exactly towing the left-wing Evangelical Feminist part line. Second, even if concerns about McCain's longevity were valid, I think he'd have to die in the first six weeks of his administration for Palin's inexperience to do half as much damage as Obama's can do from day one in office. I agree with Matt Damon that we can't have book banning, but does he really think the President has that kind of power? Perhaps he has the President of the United States mixed up with the President of Iran. Matt really shouldn't worry his pretty little head over things he doesn't understand. Posted by: Linda on October 6, 2008 08:21 PM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
I wonder if the scarier part is that other people think his opinion matters on these things? I mean, I can excuse the fact that he thinks his own opinion is important, but someone actually took the time to publish this drivel. I guess it does serve a political purpose after all.
Now, we all have to keep in mind, he did play a smart person in a movie, so that gives him credibility of some sort...
Posted by: Michael Zappe on September 12, 2008 12:10 AM