Preindustrial Sleep Patterns
Health
| July 25, 2009
| Tim
Walter A. Brown MD, Psychiatric Times:
In the course of gathering information for his book, At Day's Close: Night in Times Past, which is about night in preindustrial times, A. Roger Ekirch, professor of history at Virginia Polytechnic Institute in Roanoke, uncovered the fact that in preindustrial times before artificial illumination was widely used, persons typically slept in 2 shifts. They called the shifts "first sleep" and "second sleep." In those times, sleep was more closely associated with sunset and sunrise than it is now. Within an hour or so after sunset, persons retired to bed, slept for about 4 hours and then woke up. They remained awake for a few hours and then returned to sleep at about 2 am for another 4 hours or so. Written records from before the first century onward indicate that the period between first and second sleep afforded persons a chance for quiet contemplation, but persons also rose from bed during this interval and did household chores or visited with family and friends. Although diaries, court documents, and literature of the time indicate that this sleep pattern was widely acknowledged, this bit of history had been lost until the debut of Ekirch's work.
And:
Wehr, now Scientist Emeritus at the NIMH, conjectures that our current sleep pattern, in which we fall asleep rapidly and expect to sleep-and often do-for an uninterrupted 7 or 8 hours, may be an artifact of both chronic sleep deprivation and artificial light. When the participants in his experiments shifted from the 16-hour "days" and 8-hour "nights" customary for them (and for others in developed countries, who depend on artificial light) to the "natural winter" conditions of his experiment, they first slept for 11 hours and then began to sleep for an average of 8.9 hours, as compared with 7.2 hours under ordinary conditions. These and other data suggest that our current schedules do not allow us the sleep that we require. Wehr also observed that when given 14 hours of darkness, it took participants in bed rest about 2 hours to fall asleep compared with 15 minutes under usual conditions. He speculates that under our current conditions, we may fall asleep so quickly because we are chronically sleep-deprived.
Very interesting! You have to wonder if this is true, if it is also the source of so many sleeping disorders. Technology is not the problem solver we think it is.
Strange that they'd wake up in the middle of the night, at a time when light was so expensive, relatively speaking.
There does seem to be a correlation between sleep deprivation and obesity, which seems logical since human growth hormone is produced during deep sleep. Some bodybuilders take GABAergic drugs to improve their sleep so that they can produce more hGH.
But whether the sleep-obesity link is correlation ( For instance, someone might have some other disease like Fibromyaliga or PTSD leading to less sleep ) or whether obesity is actually caused by sleep deprivation in normal people is hard for me to say.
I don't think its fair to say that, assuming artificial light is somehow the cause of many modern sleeping disorders, somehow this means technology is causing more problems then it solves. Indeed, the very reason behind technological development is the solving of problems. Ask a man 300 years ago whether he could solve some of his problems with an electrical grid and a lightbulb and I know what his answer would be. (Yes, in this thought experiment the man understands these concepts).
Yes, it seems likely that sleep in preindustrial societies was biphasic or multiphasic. Babies and old people sleep in bits and pieces, and so do people in traditional societies, as the anthropological studies of Carol Worthman suggest. I think this ought to be some consolation for those of us who've never been able to sleep through the night. We may not be aberrant--our sleep may be conforming to an earlier pattern. I'm not sure how much this thought helps, though, when we have to start the day (as I'm doing now) on 2 hours sleep.
Check out my book INSOMNIAC for a much fuller discussion of these issues.
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once.
« A "Friendly Atheist" on Ideological Discrimination |
Front Page |
Page Two
| What's at Stake in the Intelligent Design Debate? »
|
Very interesting! You have to wonder if this is true, if it is also the source of so many sleeping disorders. Technology is not the problem solver we think it is.
Posted by: Michelle on July 25, 2009 11:42 PM