|
An enduring theme in my little world is the war between "science" and science. This idea is not new, but I seem to have gotten the narrative entirely backwards, given that I think "science" is the usual view of the "scientific" and activist establishment, held more for social, religious, monetary, and altruistic reasons than due to evidence. One bit of "science" which has been foisted on us since the Carter administration was the belief that we had to have a universal, federal 55-MPH because it saved lives. What extensive researched backed up this idea before it was implemented on a national scale?
This improvement in morality rates isn't, apparently, a mere artifact of better vehicular lifesaving technologies, but seems to correlate with fewer accidents:
To be fair, I do suspect the 55-MPH speed limit saved fuel, though (another motivation for its Carter-era promulgation). And who cares about a few lives being lost as long as fewer gallons of gasoline are consumed? ... which, come to think of it, also reminds me of another favorite bit of traffic "science" — red-light cameras — in this way:
Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |