Well, technically, if the children who are born go on to work for the private sector, they become net contributors who provide millions (if not billions) more in wealth. The only ones who "cost" are those the few handicapped who will never be able to work, and those who will choose not to create wealth — such those who work as career politicians or bureaucrats. And they shouldn't complain too much about the later because they're talking about their biggest future supporters. Odd how Democrats disdain their own. Good example of how big government devalues human life itself. Many run for office claiming life is so precious every one deserves government support, but then govern as though each new human is a curse and a burden. I guess that's inevitable when you believe economics is a zero-sum game. I agree that life should be the primary issue. And while I'm sympathetic to the argument that public funds shouldn't be used for acts that some people strongly object to and would be for minimizing use of public funds in general, lets consider some of the consequences of this bill. A first trimester abortion costs under $500 and the majority of such procedures are currently paid for out of pocket. But, regardless of the number, the Guttmacher Institute found that only 13 percent of all abortions in 2001 were directly billed to private insurance companies. Some women may have filed for reimbursement on their own; others may have been reluctant to file claims because they didn’t want their employers or spouses to know they had abortions; and other women were uninsured. Nevertheless, 74 percent of women who had abortions paid for them out of pocket.New Republic So lets assume that early term abortions could be covered by most people out of pocket. What does that leave for insurance to pick up? So called 'therapeutic abortions' done for medical reasons. This suggests to me that making such abortions unavailable would have a much greater than average impact on both the health of the mother and also on other children in the same birth cohort. How much? I don't know. But it seems worth considering in whatever calculus we go with. Posted by: Ryan W. on March 14, 2010 10:05 AM Add your two cents...
The comment rules will apply. Please post only once. |
Posted by: Ryan W. on March 13, 2010 09:53 PM